Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/930/2024 of M K LOKESHA Vs THE COUNTRY CLUB INDIA LTD., on 24 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:31398 CRL.A No. 930 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 930 OF 2024 BETWEEN: M.K.LOKESHA, S/O KALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.4349, 7TH CROSS,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 930 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
M.K.LOKESHA,
S/O KALAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
RESIDING AT DOOR NO.4349,
7TH CROSS, GANDHINAGARA,
MYSURU - 570 007.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VISHNUKUMAR K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE COUNTRY CLUB INDIA LTD.,
NO.264, NEAR TOLL GATE,
BENGALURU MYSURU MAIN ROAD,
NEAR RING ROAD,
MYSURU - 570 015.
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI
B S
Location:
High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
BY ITS MANAGER.
REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES
ACT, 1956.
2.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
COUNTRY CLUB HOSPITALITY
AND HOLIDAYS LIMITED,
6-3-1219/A, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR,
COUNTRY CLUB KOOL,
BEGUMPET,
HYDERABAD - 500 016.
STATE OF TELANGANA.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.D.KUTTAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)
----
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S 378(4) OF CR.P.C. PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 01.03.2023 PASSED BY THE
III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., MYSURU IN
C.C.NO.2241/2017 AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant files a memo. The contents of the said memo reads as follows: "Honourable Court may be pleased to treat this appeal as writ petition in the interest of justice as the appellant has already filed W.P. in W.P.No.16127/2023 wherein the Court observed that, appeal under Cr.P.C. is the proper jurisdiction and dismissed the writ petition. Hence, this memo." On going through the averments of the said memo, it appears that, as against the order passed by this court in W.P.No.16127/2023, the appeal does not lie. Hence, the learned counsel for the appellant is directed to take appropriate steps to challenge the said order before the appropriate forum having jurisdiction. For statistical purpose, the criminal appeal stands disposed of.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
HR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15