Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/368/2025 of MR VAMANA SHENOY Vs MR DHARMAPALA on 23 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:31329 CRL.RP No. 368 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.368 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MR VAMANA SHENOY S/O MOHANADAS SHENOY AGED 50 YEARS BRANCH MANAGER
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:31329
CRL.RP No. 368 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.368 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
MR VAMANA SHENOY
S/O MOHANADAS SHENOY
AGED 50 YEARS
BRANCH MANAGER
H.D.F.C. LIFE INSURANCE
BOLUVARU
PUTTUR-574 201
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JINENDRA B, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
MR DHARMAPALA
S/O BABUDAS
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/AT ‘JALAJA COMPOUND’
MAJILA, JAPPU BAPPAL
KANKANADY, MANGALURU
D.K. DISTRICT-575001
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. MELWYN DAVID MASCARENHAS, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT OF CONVICTION
DATED 16.01.2025, PASSED BY THE HONBLE II ADDL.
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:31329
CRL.RP No. 368 of 2025
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DAKSHINA KANNADA, MANGALURU, IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.32/2023 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The counsel for the petitioner is absent.
2. On perusal of the order sheet, it discloses that conditional order passed by this Court is not complied by the petitioner. The matter was referred to the mediation but not settled before the mediation since both the parties never appeared before the mediation centre. As the petitioner has not complied with the conditional order passed by this Court while suspending the sentence and this revision petition is also not yet admitted, the revision petition is dismissed as not required to consider the same in view of non-compliance of the conditional order of this Court.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN