Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1505/2024 of M RAMESH Vs KISHORE RAJ on 23 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:31036 CRL.RP No. 1505 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1505 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. M. RAMESH S/O MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O NO-48, 5TH CROSS NEW
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1505 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
M. RAMESH
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/O NO-48, 5TH CROSS
NEW BEL ROAD
CHIKKAMARANAHALLI
BENGALURU-560 097.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.B. HALLI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
KISHORE RAJ
S/O B.N.BHANDARY
AGE: MAJOR
R/O. SLV HOMES, 1ST MAIN
16TH CROSS, HMT LAYOUT
VIDYARANYAPURAM
BENGALURU-560 097.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K. PRASANNA SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF
CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
IMPUGNED ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED
BY THE LEARNED 18TH ACMM COURT, BENGALURU, IN
CC.NO.27078/2015 DATED 27.11.2019 AND ALSO ORDER
PASSED BY THE LEARNED 75TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU, IN CRL.A.NO.2687/2019
DATED 05.10.2024 AND TO REMAND THE MATTER TO THE
TRIAL
COURT
FOR
FRESH
TRAIL
FOR
PROVIDING
AN
OPPORTUNITY TO THE PETITIONER TO CROSS EXAMINE THE
RESPONDENT AND ALSO ADDUCING THE DEFENCE EVIDENCE.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This matter is listed for admission. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent.
2. Having perused the material on record, it is seen that this transaction has taken place between the complainant and accused in respect of a sale transaction for purchase of property. On the assurance that accused would execute the sale deed within one month, the complainant has given advance amount of Rs.10,50,000/- and when the accused did not come forward to execute the sale deed, the complainant demanded to repay the same and the petitioner did not repay the same and issued a Cheque. Subsequently, when the Cheque was dishonoured, proceedings was initiated. The accused did not plead guilty. Hence, the complainant examined
HC-KAR
himself as P.W.1 and got marked the documents as Exs.P1 to P8. The statement of accused was recorded under 313 of Cr.P.C. and he did not lead any defence evidence and even, he did not cross-examine the witness P.W.1.
3. Having taken note of the same, question of entertaining the revision petition does not arise. The Trial Court also in detail discussed with regard to the case of complainant in paragraph Nos.11 and 12 of the judgment. Hence, I do not find any ground to entertain this revision petition and no ground is made out to admit the revision. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29