Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/361/2025 of M. R. SRINIVAS Vs K. R. KRISHNA PRASAD on 23 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:31331 CRL.RP No. 361 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.361 OF 2025 BETWEEN: M. R. SRINIVAS S/O RANGASWAMY M K AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/ A NO.557, 1ST
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:31331
CRL.RP No. 361 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.361 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
M. R. SRINIVAS
S/O RANGASWAMY M K
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
R/A NO.557, 1ST MAIN
15TH CROSS, R H B C S LAYOUT
SRIGANDHADA KAVALU
NAGARABHAVI POST
BANGALORE – 560072
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NARESH KUMAR B R, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
K. R. KRISHNA PRASAD
S/O RAJAGOPAL IYENGAR
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/AT NO.214, 4B,
3RD FLOOR, BREEZE ENCALVE
4TH MAIN ROAD
NEAR VSS INTERNATIONAL
PUBLIC SCHOOL
JAGAJYOTHI NAGAR
NAGADEVANAHALLI
BANGALORE – 560056
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. ASHWATH C M, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:31331
CRL.RP No. 361 of 2025
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.11.2024
THE COURT OF LVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
(CCH-57) AT BENGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.618/2023 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The counsel for the petitioner is absent.
2. The counsel for the respondent submits that the conditional order passed by this Court is not complied by the petitioner.
3. On perusal of the order sheet, it discloses that the matter was referred to the mediation but not settled before the mediation since both the parties never appeared before the mediation centre. As the petitioner has not complied with the conditional order passed by this Court while suspending the sentence and this revision petition is also not yet admitted, the revision petition is dismissed as not required to consider the same in view of non-compliance of the conditional order of this Court.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN