Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/391/2025 of M/S ESSEN ELECTRICALS AND ENTERPRISES PVT LTD., Vs SRI RAJURAM CHOUDHARY on 23 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:31330 CRL.RP No. 391 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.391 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. M/S ESSEN ELECTRICALS AND ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. REGISTERED OFFICE AT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.391 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S ESSEN ELECTRICALS AND
ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.
REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.204,
68TH CROSS, V BLOCK
RAJAJINAGARA
BENGALURU-560 010
REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR
MR. RANGARAJAN KARTHIK
2.
MR. RANGARAJAN KARTHIK
DIRECTOR
M/S. ESSEN ELECTRICALS AND
ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,
PLOT NO.52, 4TH CROSS
SSI AREA, RAJAJINAGARA
BENGALURU-560 010
3.
SMT. NAGAMANI S
DIRECTOR
M/S. ESSEN ELECTRICALS AND
ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,
REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.204,
68TH CROSS, V BLOCK, RAJAJINAGARA
BENGALURU-560 010
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI CHANDRA KUMAREGOWDA H N, ADVOCATE
[ABSENT])
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
SRI RAJURAM CHOUDHARY
S/O SRI. DAGALARAMA CHOUDHARY
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
PROPRIETOR OF
M/S. RAJ ELECRO CONTROL
D.K. VENKATESHA BUILDING
1ST FLOOR
SHOP NO.6
B.V.K. IYENGAR ROAD CROSS
BENGALURU-560 053
REP. BY HIS P.A. HOLDER
SRI. RAVISHANKAR THODINNAAYA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PUTTARAJA C P, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.PC (FILED
U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT, CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE
LEARNED XXI A.C.M.M BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.20059/2019
DATED 30.04.2022 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The counsel for the petitioners is absent.
2. On perusal of the order sheet, it discloses that conditional order passed by this Court is not complied by the petitioners. The matter was referred to the Lok-adalath and there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and again the matter was listed before the Lok-adalath but referred back to the Court as there is no possibility of settlement. Again, the matter was referred to the mediation but not settled before the mediation since both the parties never appeared before the mediation centre. As the petitioner has not complied with the conditional order passed by this Court while suspending the sentence and this revision petition is also not yet admitted and the counsel for the petitioners is not pursuing the matter diligently, the revision petition is dismissed as not required to consider the same in view of non-compliance of the conditional order of this Court.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN