Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1595/2024 of MR SRINIVASULU B V Vs MR LOKESH K on 23 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:31327 CRL.RP No. 1595 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1595 OF 2024 BETWEEN: MR SRINIVASULU B V AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O VENKATAIAH NO.94, HARIKUSH
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:31327
CRL.RP No. 1595 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1595 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
MR SRINIVASULU B V
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
S/O VENKATAIAH
NO.94, HARIKUSH NILAYA
2ND FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD
THAMMAIAH GARDEN
ABBIGERE
BENGALURU-560 090
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI DILRAJ JUDE ROHIT SEQUEIRA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
MR LOKESH K
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
S/O MR G N KRISHNAPPA
NO.34, ANUBHANDA NILAYA
2ND CROSS, ABBIGERE
BENGALURU-560090
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAJESH A, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE
PASSED BY THE HONORABLE COURT OF XII ACMM, AT
BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.14261/2020 DTD 15.04.2024 AND ETC.
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:31327
CRL.RP No. 1595 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The counsel for the petitioner is absent.
2. The counsel for the respondent submits that the conditional order passed by this Court is not complied by the petitioner.
3. On perusal of the order sheet, it discloses that the matter was referred to the mediation but was not settled before the mediation. As the petitioner has not complied with the conditional order passed by this Court while suspending the sentence and this revision petition is also not yet admitted, the revision petition is dismissed as not required to consider the same in view of non-compliance of the conditional order of this Court.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN