Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/2237/2023 of SRI ADINARAYANACHARI Vs SRI D N DORAISWAMY NAIDU on 22 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:30976 CRL.A No. 2237 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2237 OF 2023 ( A ) BETWEEN: SRI. ADINARAYANACHARI, S/O LATE MUNILINGACHARI, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, RESIDING
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2237 OF 2023 (A)
BETWEEN:
SRI. ADINARAYANACHARI,
S/O LATE MUNILINGACHARI,
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.34,
SATHYANARAYANA ROAD,
MAGADI ROAD, KAMAKSHIPALYA,
BENGALURU - 560 079.
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT
NO.29, 3RD CROSS,
SANJEEVININAGAR,
HEGGANAHALLI,
BENGALURU - 560 091.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SANGEETA SANGANNAVAR., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. D.N. DORAISWAMY NAIDU,
S/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY NAIDU,
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI B
S
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.252,
8TH MAIN, HOYSALA SCHOOL ROAD,
PIPELINE, SRINIVASA NAGAR,
SUNKADAKATTE,
BENGALURU - 560 091.
…RESPONDENT
----
THIS CRL.A FILED U/S. 378(4) CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE
FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT THIS HONORABLE COURT
MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER
OF ACQUITTAL DATED 07.12.2018 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE
LIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU, IN CRL.A.NO.148/2016, RESTORE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER
OF CONVICTION DATED 11.01.2016, PASSED BY THE HON’BLE
XVI A.C.M.M COURT AT BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.34366/2011, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION.138 OF
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1882.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Despite giving sufficient opportunities, learned counsel for the appellant has not complied with the office-objections even on the 6th time also.
2. Accordingly, this criminal appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office-objections and non-prosecution.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NM/-