Karnataka High Court

CRL.A/2237/2023 of SRI ADINARAYANACHARI Vs SRI D N DORAISWAMY NAIDU on 22 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:30976 CRL.A No. 2237 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2237 OF 2023 ( A ) BETWEEN: SRI. ADINARAYANACHARI, S/O LATE MUNILINGACHARI, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, RESIDING

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2237 OF 2023 (A)

BETWEEN:

SRI. ADINARAYANACHARI,

S/O LATE MUNILINGACHARI,

AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.34,

SATHYANARAYANA ROAD,

MAGADI ROAD, KAMAKSHIPALYA,

BENGALURU - 560 079.

PRESENTLY RESIDING AT

NO.29, 3RD CROSS,

SANJEEVININAGAR,

HEGGANAHALLI,

BENGALURU - 560 091.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. SANGEETA SANGANNAVAR., ADVOCATE)

AND:

SRI. D.N. DORAISWAMY NAIDU,

S/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY NAIDU,

Digitally

signed by

SUSHMA

LAKSHMI B

S

Location:

High Court

of Karnataka

HC-KAR

AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.252,

8TH MAIN, HOYSALA SCHOOL ROAD,

PIPELINE, SRINIVASA NAGAR,

SUNKADAKATTE,

BENGALURU - 560 091.

…RESPONDENT

----

THIS CRL.A FILED U/S. 378(4) CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE

FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT THIS HONORABLE COURT

MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER

OF ACQUITTAL DATED 07.12.2018 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE

LIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU, IN CRL.A.NO.148/2016, RESTORE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER

OF CONVICTION DATED 11.01.2016, PASSED BY THE HON’BLE

XVI A.C.M.M COURT AT BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.34366/2011, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION.138 OF

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1882.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

HC-KAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Despite giving sufficient opportunities, learned counsel for the appellant has not complied with the office-objections even on the 6th time also.

2. Accordingly, this criminal appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office-objections and non-prosecution.

Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

NM/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead