Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/279/2023 of SRI KRISHNA MURTHY N G Vs SRI SHIVANANDA A R on 22 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:30683 CRL.RP No. 305 of 2023 C/W CRL.RP No. 279 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.305 OF 2023 C/W CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.279 OF 2023 IN CRL.RP
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.305 OF 2023
C/W
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.279 OF 2023
IN CRL.RP NO.305/2023
BETWEEN:
SRI KRISHNA MURTHY N G
S/O LATE GAVIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
R/AT BESIDE CHETHANA SCHOOL
FRONT GATE, B H ROAD
SHIVAGANGA BADAVANE
B H ROAD
TUMAKURU CITY 572101
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. V B SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. PADMA K
W/O SHIVANNA A R
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/AT SAPTHAGIRI, 1ST BLOCK
3RD MAIN, 3RD CROSS
KUVEMPUANAGAR
TUMKAURU CITY -572103
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. YATHISH J NADIGA, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.02.2023, PASSED BY THE COURT OF II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE
AT
TUMAKURU
PASSED
IN
CRL.A.NO.33/2022 AND ETC.
IN CRL.RP NO.279/2023
BETWEEN:
SRI KRISHNA MURTHY N G
S/O LATE GAVIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
R/AT BESIDE CHETHANA SCHOOL,
FRONT GATE, B H ROAD
SHIVAGANGA BADAVANE
B H ROAD
TUMAKURU CITY – 572101
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. V B SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI SHIVANANDA A R
W/O RAJASHEKARAIAH A L
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
R/A SAPTHAGIRI, 1ST BLOCK
3RD MAIN, 3RD CROSS
KUVEMPUNAGARA
TUMAKURU CITY-572103
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. YATHISH J NADIGA, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING
TO
SET
ASIDE
THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
DATED 27.02.2023 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT TUMAKURU IN CRL.A.NO.32/2022 AND ETC.
HC-KAR
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the respective parties and the parties are present before the Court in both the cases.
2. The parties have filed separate joint memos. In Crl.R.P.No.305/2023
3. In term of the joint memo, they have agreed to settle the matter for a sum of Rs.9,67,500/- as against Rs.10,77,500/-. It is submitted that the petitioner has deposited an amount of Rs.2,15,500/- after suspension of sentence before the Appellate Court and Rs.3,23,250/- after order of this Court and for remaining amount, the petitioner has given Demand Draft bearing No.355567 for an amount of Rs.4,30,000/-. The complainant has also acknowledged the receipt of the demand draft. In Crl.R.P.No.279/2023
4. The parties have filed joint memo. In term of the joint memo, they have agreed to settle the matter for a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- as against Rs.7,00,000/-. It is submitted that
HC-KAR
the petitioner has deposited an amount of Rs.1,42,000/- after suspension of sentence before the Appellate Court and Rs.2,13,000/- after the order of this Court and for remaining amount, the petitioner has given Demand Draft bearing No.355568 for an amount of Rs.2,40,000/-. The wife of Mr. Shivananda A R has also acknowledged the receipt of the demand draft and difference amount of Rs.5,000/- is paid by way of cash before the Court and the wife of Shivananda A R is also acknowledged the same.
5. The joint memos are taken on record. In view of the said joint memos, the revision petitions are disposed of.
6. The revision petitioner of both the cases is directed to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- in each case which is imposed by the Trial Court within two weeks from today. The counsel for the petitioner is directed to produce the receipt for having deposited the fine amount before the registry within two weeks. If fails to furnish the same, list the matter before the Court for payment of fine amount on 03.07.2026. If receipt is furnished, no need to list the matter before the Court.
HC-KAR
7. The petitioner has no objection to withdraw the amount which is in deposit before the Trial Court by the respective respondents.
8. Registry is directed to send the records to the Trial Court forthwith.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN