Karnataka High Court
WP/8514/2021 of AKANKSHA ENTERPRISES PVT LTD Vs THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER on 22 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:31183-DB WP No. 8514 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 8514 OF 2021 (L-PF) BETWEEN: AKANKSHA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., A
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
WRIT PETITION NO. 8514 OF 2021 (L-PF)
BETWEEN:
AKANKSHA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,
A REGISTERED COMPANY
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT
NO.229, HSR EXTENSION, AGARA,
BANGALORE - 561 102.
REPRESENTED BY
SRI.M.RAMESH,
MANAGING DIRECTOR.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KUMARA SWAMY N.R., ADVOCATE AND
SRI. HEMANTH R RAO, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT
FUND COMMISSIONER,
REGINAL OFFICE,
BOMASANDRA - II,
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT
FUND ORGANISATION,
ANNAPOORNESHWARI COMPLEX,
SURVEY NO.37/1
6TH MAIN, SINGASANDRA,
Digitally signed
by
SHARADAVANI B
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
HOSUR MAIN ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 068.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. NALINI VENKATESH., ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
DATED 07.01.2021 PASSED BY THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL CUM LABOUR COURT IN EPF NO.138/2018 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE - C AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
None appeared on behalf of the petitioner either in the first call or in the second call.
2. However, learned counsel for the respondent has joined the proceedings through virtual mode.
3. Considering non-appearance of the counsel for the petitioner, we have no option but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution.
HC-KAR
4. Ordered accordingly and petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE BSV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8