Karnataka High Court

RSA.CROB/13/2011 of POLICE ARASEGOWDA @ARASAPPA Vs VISHWANATH on 22 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:30821 RSA.CROB No. 13 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH RSA CROSS OBJECTION NO.13 OF 2011 BETWEEN: 1. POLICE ARASEGOWDA @ARASAPPA AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS S/O LATE THOPEGOWDA 2.

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

RSA CROSS OBJECTION NO.13 OF 2011

BETWEEN:

1.

POLICE ARASEGOWDA

@ARASAPPA

AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS

S/O LATE THOPEGOWDA

2.

PUTTALAKSHMAMMA

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

W/O POLICE ARASEGOWDA

@ ARASAPPA

3.

VANAJAKSHI

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

W/O SATHYANARAYANA

4.

SRIDEVI

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

W/O MOHAN RAJ

ALL ARE R/O BOOVANAHALLI VILLAGE,

BOOVANAHALLI POST,

KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK.

…CROSS OBJECTORS

(CROSS OBJECTORS 1 TO 4 (ABSENT))

AND:

1.

VISHWANATH

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

Digitally signed

by DEVIKA M

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

S/O POLICE ARASEGOWDA @ ARASAPPA

DOOR NO.62,OLD MADRAS ROAD,

BEHIND HOTEL SHREE, ULSOOR,

BANGALORE.

…RESPONDENT

THIS RSA CROB IN RSA NO.1873/08 IS FILED UNDER

ORDER 41 RULE 22 R/W SEC.100 OF CPC., 1908, AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.04.2008 PASSED IN

RA.NO.140/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL

JUDGE (SR.DN.) HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL

MODIFYING JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.09.2006

PASSED IN OS.NO.399/1996 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL., CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND JMFC, HASSAN.

THIS RSA CROB, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

In this matter, learned counsel on record was retired on 16.01.2020 and the Court has directed to show the name of the cross-objectors in the cause list. When the counsel was permitted to retire, cross objectors were called out and they remained absent. There is no representation and even though matter is listed for four times for taking steps but the same is not taken. Moreover, there is a delay of 262 days in filing the cross objection. As such, it is clear that from last 6 years, the

HC-KAR

cross-objectors are not pursuing the matter and hence, cross objection is dismissed.

Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead