Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1611/2024 of SRI B LOKAPPA Vs SRI M CHITRAPPA on 22 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:30829 CRL.RP No. 1611 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1611 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI B LOKAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O BASAVARAJAPPA, OCC DRIVER CUM
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1611 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI B LOKAPPA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
S/O BASAVARAJAPPA,
OCC DRIVER CUM CONDUCTOR,
BADGE NO 1025, KSRTC,
DAVANAGERE DEPOT-I,
DAVANAGERE DIVISION,
DAVANAGERE 577002
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. TUMBIGI PRABHUGOUDA
BASAVANTARAYAGOUDA,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI M CHITRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
S/O MALLAPPA,
RETD. EMPLOYEE OF KSRTC OF DAVANAGERE,
PRESENTLY R/AT DOO NO 3682/A60,
MALLIKARJUNA NILAYA, 8TH CROSS,
BEHIND VANI RICE MILL,
THARALABALU BADAVANE,
HADADI ROAD,DAVANAGERE 577525
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SREE HARSHA A K,ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C (U/S 438
R/W 442 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER
PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED
TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE PASSED BY
HONBLE
PRINCIPAL
DISTRICT
AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE,
DAVANAGERE IN CRL.A.NO.116/2023 DTD 28.08.2024 IN
CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE
HONBLE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DAVANAGERE IN CC.NO.2/2022 DTD 30.09.2023, FOR THE
OFFENCES P/U/S 138 OF NI ACT AND TO ACQUIT THE
PETITIONER/ACCUSED FROM THE ABOVE CASE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the revision petitioner is absent.
This Court vide order dated 20.01.2025 passed the conditional order and the same is not complied with. No representation on behalf of revision petitioner and matter is also not yet admitted. Further, this Court also passed order dated 14.03.2025 by granting two weeks time to deposit the fine amount, failing which the trial Court is at liberty to proceed against the revision petitioner. In spite of this order also, learned counsel for the revision petitioner is not pursuing the matter and once again vide
HC-KAR
order dated 28.04.2025, two weeks time is granted extending the time to comply with the interim order. In spite of granting time for two times, the revision petitioner has not complied the interim order and also not pursued the matter before the mediation. Even the revision petitioner is not showing any interest in pursuing the matter and moreover, the revision is also not yet admitted. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed for non compliance of the conditional order and also not pursuing the matter.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SSD List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8