Karnataka High Court
MFA/2794/2025 of MAHESH R V Vs ARUNA G on 22 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:31077-DB MFA No. 2794 of 2025 C/W MFA No. 3545 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2794 OF 2025 (GW) C/W
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2794 OF 2025 (GW)
C/W
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3545 OF 2025
IN MFA No. 2794/2025
BETWEEN:
MAHESH R.V.,
S/O VEERAMALLAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
2ND MAIN, 4TH CROSS,
SRINAGAR,
KYATHSANDRA,
TUMAKURU - 572 104.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI.MAHESH R.V. - PARTY IN PERSON)
AND:
ARUNA G,
D/O LATE. GOPAL G,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
BAIRAWESHWARA NILAYA,
1ST BLOCK, 3RD MAIN,
3RD CROSS,
Digitally signed
by
SHARADAVANI
B
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
KUVEMPU NAGARA,
TUMAKURU - 572 103.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. G.S.VENKAT SUBBARAO., ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.47 (a) OF GUARDIAN AND
WARDS ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
05.03.2025 PASSED IN G AND WC NO.14/2019 ON THE FILE
OF THE I ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, TUMAKURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.6
AND 13 OF THE HINDU MINORITY AND GUARDIANS ACT, 1956
R/W SEC.10 OF THE GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT, 1890.
IN MFA NO. 3545/2025
BETWEEN:
SMT. ARUNA G,
W/O. SRI.MAHESH R.V.,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
R/A BAIRAWESHWARA NILAYA,
1ST BLOCK, 3RD MAIN,
3RD CROSS,
KUVEMPU NAGAR,
TUMKURU - 572 103.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. G.S.VENKAT SUBBARAO.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. MAHESH R.V.,
S/O VEERAMALLAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/AT 2ND MAIN, 4TH CROSS,
SRINAGAR,
KYATHSANDRA,
TUMAKRU.
...RESPONDENT
HC-KAR
(BY SRI.MAHESH R.V. - PARTY IN PERSON)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.47 (a) OF GUARDIAN AND
WARDS ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
05.03.2025 PASSED IN G AND WC NO.14/2019 ON THE FILE
OF
THE
I
ADDITIONAL
PRL.
JUDGE,
FAMILY
COURT,
TUMAKURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.6
AND 13 OF THE HINDU MINORITY AND GUARDIANS ACT, 1956
R/W SEC.10 OF THE GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT, 1890.
THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
These two appeals under Section 47(a) of Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 have been filed by both the parents challenging the order dated 05.03.2025 passed by the First Additional Principal Judge, Family Court at Tumkuru in G & WC No.14/2029.
2. The void marriage came to be solemnized between the parties/parents on 21.11.2018. Chi. Poorvik @ Rahul R.M. was born out of wedlock on 26.10.2019. Soon after the birth of the said child, the parties have
HC-KAR
been in a sore relationship and have been fighting in the Court. MFA No.3509/2025 c/w MFA No.3565/2025 have been disposed of today, i.e., on 22.06.2026 and we have declared the marriage solemnized between the parties/parents of the child as null and void under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. At present, the minor son, Poorvik, @ Rahul R.M. is in the custody of the mother. However, the Family Court has granted visitation rights to the father. We do not find any error in the impugned order passed by the Family Court.
3. We therefore, affirm the order passed by the Family Court, however, with modification that the respondent-father shall provide Rs.20,000/- p.m. (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) for expenses of the child, Chi. Poorvik @ Rahul M.R.
4. The respondent - father may admit the child in a better school. However, he has to bear all the admission and education expenses of the son besides giving monthly
HC-KAR
maintenance of Rs.20,000/- per month for expenses of the child.
With the above said modification, we dispose of both the appeals.
5. Any deviation or non-compliance of this order by either of the parties shall have the serious consequences and in such an eventuality, the other party can approach this Court by moving an appropriate application. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE BSV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0