Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1525/2024 of M/S HARIHARA FILLING STATION Vs M/S KOUSHAL ENTERPRISES on 22 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:30682 CRL.RP No. 1267 of 2018 C/W CRL.RP No. 1268 of 2018 CRL.RP No. 1269 of 2018 AND 1 OTHER IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1267 OF 2018 C/W CRIMINAL
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1267 OF 2018
C/W
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1268 OF 2018
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1269 OF 2018
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1525 OF 2024
IN CRL.RP NO. 1267/2018
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S HARIHARA FILLING STATION
REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR &
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
SRI J SANTHOSH
2.
J SANTOSH
S/O R JAYAPAL
M/S HARIHARA FILLING STATION
BOTH AT: NO.16/2
HEGGANAHALLI MAIN ROAD
NEAR MOHAN CINEMA HALL
YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI
BENGALURU - 560 022
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI ASHWIN KUMAR H, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
SRI D MADHU
S/O LATE DURGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/AT NO.6, 1ST CROSS
KESHAVANAGARA, MAGADI ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 023
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. DASHRATH T M, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED
07.11.2018 OF THE LXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE,
BANGALORE
(CCH-69)
IN
CRL.A.NO.936/2017 AND ETC.
IN CRL.RP NO. 1268/2018
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S HARIHARA FILLING STATION
REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR &
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
2.
J SANTOSH
S/O R JAYAPAL
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
M/S HARIHARA FILLING STATION
BOTH AT: NO.16/2
HEGGANAHALLI MAIN ROAD
NEAR MOHAN CINEMA HALL
YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI
BENGALURU - 560 022
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ASHWIN KUMAR H, ADVOCATE)
HC-KAR
AND:
SRI SARAVANA
S/O SHEKAR
MAJOR
R/AT NO.6
1ST CROSS, MAGADI ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 023
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. T M DASHARATH, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER
DATED 07.11.2018 OF THE HON'BLE LXVIII ADDITIONAL
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU(CCH-69)
IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.937/2017 AND ETC.
IN CRL.RP NO. 1269/2018
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S HARIHARA FILLING STATION
REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR &
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
2.
J SANTOSH
S/O R JAYAPAL
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
M/S HARIHARA FILLING STATION
BOTH AT: NO.16/2
HEGGANAHALLI MAIN ROAD
NEAR MOHAN CINEMA HALL
YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI
BENGALURU - 560 022
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ASHWIN KUMAR H, ADVOCATE)
HC-KAR
AND:
SRI P M NARAYANASWAMY
S/O MUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/AT NO.3, 3RD CROSS
OPP VENKATASWAMY TEXTILES
MAGADI ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 023
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. DASHARATH T M.,ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER
DATED 07.11.2018, OF THE HON'BLE LXVIII ADDITIONAL
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY
(CCH-69) IN CRL.A.NO.935/2017 AND ETC.
IN CRL.RP NO. 1525/2024
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S HARIHARA FILLING STATION
O/A NO.16/2
NEAR MOHAN THEATRE
YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI
BENGALURU
REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
SRI J SANTHOSH
2.
J SANTOSH
S/O JAYAPAL R
AGED 44 YEARS
R/AT NO.723, 62ND CROSS
5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR
BENGALURUR – 560 010
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ASHWIN KUMAR H, ADVOCATE)
HC-KAR
AND:
M/S KOUSHAL ENTERPRISES
/PA NO.92, 70TH CROSS
6TH BLOCK, RAJAJINGARA
BENGALURU -560010
REP BY ITS PROPREITOR MR NGARENDRA
S/O LATE MUNISWAMY NAIDU
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. LANKESH L, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.PC
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER
DATED
05.10.2024
PASSED
IN
CRL.A.NO.566/2022
PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LXIX ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU AND ETC.
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
In Crl.R.P.Nos.1267, 1268 and 1269/2018
The counsel for the respective parties and the parties are present before the Court in all the cases and filed separate joint memo reporting compromise of each petitions.
2. In terms of the joint memos, the parties have agreed to settle the matter for a sum of Rs.12,00,000/- in each case as a full and final settlement as against Rs.14,90,000/-. It
HC-KAR
is submitted that out of settlement amount of Rs.12,00,000/-, an amount of Rs.5,97,000/- in each case is already deposited before the Trial Court and for remaining amount of Rs.6,03,000/-, the petitioner/accused has given separate Demand Draft bearing Nos.012920, 012921 and 012923 in favour of the respective complainants. The complainants have also acknowledged the receipt of their demand drafts respectively.
In Crl.R.P.No.1525/2024
3. The counsel for the respective parties and the parties are present before the Court and filed a joint memo reporting compromise of the petition.
4. In terms of the joint memo, the parties have agreed to settle the matter for a sum of Rs.34,14,500/- as a full and final settlement as against Rs.40,00,000/-. It is submitted that out of settlement amount of Rs.34,14,500/-, an amount of Rs.8,10,000/- and Rs.12,04,500/-, totally an amount of Rs.20,14,500/- is already deposited before the Trial Court and for remaining amount of Rs.14,00,000/-, the petitioner/accused has given Demand Draft bearing No.012922 in favour of the
HC-KAR
complainant. The complainant has also acknowledged the receipt of the said demand draft.
5. The joint memos are taken on record. In view of the said joint memos, the revision petitions are disposed of.
6. The revision petitioner is directed to pay total fine of Rs.35,000/- which is imposed in the aforesaid cases by the Trial Court within two weeks from today. The counsel for the petitioner is directed to produce the receipt for having deposited the fine amount in all the cases before the registry within two weeks. If fails to furnish the same, list the matters before the Court for payment of fine amount on 03.07.2026. If receipt is furnished, no need to list the matter before the Court.
7. The petitioner has no objection to withdraw the amount which is in deposit before the Trial Court by the respective respondents.
8. Registry is directed to send the records to the Trial Court forthwith.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN