Karnataka High Court

WP/6665/2024 of SMT. ARUNA G Vs SRI. MAHESH R V on 22 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:31179-DB WP No. 6665 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 6665 OF 2024 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SMT.ARUNA G, D/O GOPAL, AGED ABOUT 28

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

WRIT PETITION NO. 6665 OF 2024 (GM-FC)

BETWEEN:

SMT.ARUNA G,

D/O GOPAL,

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

R/AT 1ST CROSS,

NAGANNANA PALYA MAIN ROAD,

HEMAVATHI BLOCK,

IDSMT BADAVANE, SIRA GATE,

TUMAKURU - 572 101.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. G.S.VENKAT SUBBA RAO., ADVOCATE)

AND:

SRI. MAHESH R.V.,

S/O VEERAMALLAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

R/AT 2ND CROSS,

4TH CROSS, SRINAGAR,

KYATHSANDRA,

TUMAKURU - 572 101.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI.MAHESH R.V., - PARTY IN PERSON)

Digitally signed

by

SHARADAVANI B

Location: High

Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED

ORDER DATED 09.02.2024 PASSED BY THE PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, TUMAKURU IN CRL. MISC NO.30/2023 VIDE

ANNEXURE - A AND ETC.,

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING

IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS

UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)

The present writ petition has been filed impugning the order dated 09.02.2024 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Tumakuru, in Crl.Misc.No.30/2023 whereby the application field under section 340 Cr.P.C. filed by the respondent has been allowed and the Chief Ministerial Officer of that Court has been directed to file the complainant against the petitioner-wife in the Court of jurisdictional Magistrate.

2. The writ petition against such an order is not maintainable inasmuch as, the proceedings have been

HC-KAR

initiated under section 340 of Cr.P.C., and therefore, we dismiss this writ petition as not maintainable.

Petitioner is at liberty to take recourse to the appropriate proceeding as available to her in law, if she is so advised. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE BSV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead