Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1555/2024 of SRI SUNNY O C Vs SRI BINISH P on 22 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:30822 CRL.RP No. 1555 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1555 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI SUNNY O C S/O. CHERIAN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT OORAPALLY
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1555 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI SUNNY O C
S/O. CHERIAN,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
R/AT OORAPALLY HOUSE,
PARIYARAMKUNNU,KANIYARAM,
MANANTHAVADY,KERALA-670 645.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HEMANTH KUMAR K,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI BINISH P
S/O. JOSE. P. V.,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
R/AT D. NO. 4542/A,
ST. MARYS ROAD,
2ND CROSS, N.R. MOHALLA,
MYSURU-570 007.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. DILIP KUMAR,ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.PC (FILED
U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE
PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY
BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
DATED 16.11.2023 IN C.C.NO.380/2018 PASSED BY THE IV
ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C AT MYSURU CONVICTING THE
PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I ACT AND THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN CRL.A.NO.439/2024 PASSED BY THE VII ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE AT MYSURU DATED 30.05.2024 AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER IN THE ABOVE CASE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL ORDER
This Court vide order dated 04.04.2025 passed the conditional order suspending the sentence.
2. The matter is referred to the mediation and the same is not settled. Even, the revision petitioner is not pursuing the matter diligently.
3. Learned counsel for respondent submits that the matter appears to be settled by parties themselves.
4. Under the circumstances, when the revision petition is not yet admitted and the revision petitioner has not complied the conditional order dated 04.04.2025.
HC-KAR
Hence, the revision petition is dismissed in view of non- compliance of the conditional order dated 04.04.2025 and also not pursuing the matter.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SSD List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2