Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/962/2021 of G SRINIVAS Vs P RAMALINGAM on 19 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:30224 CRL.A No. 962 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 962 OF 2021 ( A ) BETWEEN: G SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O LATE GAVISHETTY NO.139/6, 1ST CROSS,
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:30224
CRL.A No. 962 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 962 OF 2021 (A)
BETWEEN:
G SRINIVAS
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
S/O LATE GAVISHETTY
NO.139/6, 1ST CROSS,
NIMISHAMBA EXTENSION,
VASHISTA ROAD,
KUVEMPUNAGAR,
MYSOORU – 570 001.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. G S PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT) )
AND:
P RAMALINGAM
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
S/O PONNAMBALAM,
TOKEN NO.370,
KARNATAKA SILK INDUSTRIES CORPORATION,
SILK WEAVING FACTORY,
OLD WEAVING SECTION,
MANANDAVADI ROAD,
MYSOORU – 570 001.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 378(4) OF CR.PC (FILED U/S
419(4) BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER
DATED 24.06.2019 PASSED BY THE I ADDITIONAL SESSIONS
JUDGE, MYSURU AND IN CRL.A.NO.139/2018 AND SET ASIDE
THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED 08.06.2018 PASSED BY
THE I ADDITIONAL I CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., MYSURU IN
C.C.NO.1413/2013, CONVICTING THE RESPONDENT FOR THE
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI B
S
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:30224
CRL.A No. 962 of 2021
OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT AND SENTENCING TO PAY
FINE OF RS.1,25,000/- AND IN DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF FINE, TO UNDERGO S.I. FOR 6 MONTHS AND ALLOW THIS APPEAL BY
ACQUITTING THE APPELLANT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellant.
2. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office-objections and non-prosecution.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4