Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/2378/2024 of SHRESTA NUTRITIONS PVT LTD Vs SUN AGROVERT on 18 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:29992 CRL.A No. 2378 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2378 OF 2024 ( A ) BETWEEN: SHRESTA NUTRITIONS PVT LTD., AT NO.45, NAGAURU VILLAGE, NEAR MANTRI LAYOUT,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2378 OF 2024 (A)
BETWEEN:
SHRESTA NUTRITIONS PVT LTD.,
AT NO.45, NAGAURU VILLAGE,
NEAR MANTRI LAYOUT,
HUSKUR MAIN ROAD,
DASANAPURA HOBLI,
BENGALURU NORTH – 562 123.
REPRESENTED BY MR.ARVIND.G.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. RAJAKUMAR M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SUN AGROVERT
NO.4/2, 1ST FLOOR, 7TH CROSS,
WEST PARK ROAD, MALLESHARAM,
BENGALURU - 560 003.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PROPRIETOR MR.SUNIL. V.
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI
B S
Location:
High Court
of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
MR. SUNIL.V
PROPRIETOR AUTHORISED
SIGNATORY, SUN AGROVERT,
NO.4/2, 1ST FLOOR, 7TH CROSS,
WEST PARK ROAD, MALLESHARAM,
BENGALURU – 560 003.
…RESPONDENTS
----
THIS CRL.A FILED U/S 378(4) CR.PC (FILED U/S 419(4)
OF BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING
THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 30.03.2021, PASSED BY THE
HON’BLE XII ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,, BANGALORE
AND
RESTORE
THE
COMPLAINT
BEARING
C.C.NO.2265/2020 AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Despite giving sufficient opportunities, office objections have not been complied with.
Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed for not complying office objections.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NM