Karnataka High Court

CRL.A/697/2022 of SRI. T. NEELAKANTAIAH Vs SRI BENKI CHIDANANDA on 18 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:30000 CRL.A No. 697 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 697 OF 2022 ( A ) BETWEEN: SRI. T. NEELAKANTAIAH, S/O LATE SRI. THATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT NO.17C,

HC-KAR

NC: 2026:KHC:30000

CRL.A No. 697 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 697 OF 2022 (A)

BETWEEN:

SRI. T. NEELAKANTAIAH,

S/O LATE SRI. THATAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,

R/AT NO.17C, GANDHINAGARA,

2ND CROSS, RAMANAGARAM TOWN,

RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT - 562 159.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. R B SADASIVAPPA., ADVOCATE)

AND:

SRI. BENKI CHIDANANDA,

S/O LATE SRI. BENKI TIPPESWAMI,

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

R/AT L-63, 3RD A MAIN, 1ST BLOCK,

RAMAKRISHNA NAGARA,

MYSORE – 570 022.

…RESPONDENT

Digitally

signed by

SUSHMA

LAKSHMI

B S

Location:

High

Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

NC: 2026:KHC:30000

CRL.A No. 697 of 2022

THIS CRL.A FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE

ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE

COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED

JUDGMENT OF THE FIRST APPELLATE COURT III ADDITIONAL

SESSIONS JUDGE, MSYURU DATED 01.04.2019, PASSED IN

CRL.A.NO.47/2019 AND CONSEQUENTLY, SETTING ASIDE THE

JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED 25.01.2019, PASSED BY

THE IV ADDITIONAL FIRST CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C.

MYSURU, IN C.C.NO.1984/2015 AND BE PLEASED TO ALLOW

THE ABOVE.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

Despite giving sufficient opportunities office objections have not been complied with.

Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed for not complying office objections.

Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

NM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead