Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/697/2022 of SRI. T. NEELAKANTAIAH Vs SRI BENKI CHIDANANDA on 18 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:30000 CRL.A No. 697 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 697 OF 2022 ( A ) BETWEEN: SRI. T. NEELAKANTAIAH, S/O LATE SRI. THATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT NO.17C,
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:30000
CRL.A No. 697 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 697 OF 2022 (A)
BETWEEN:
SRI. T. NEELAKANTAIAH,
S/O LATE SRI. THATAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
R/AT NO.17C, GANDHINAGARA,
2ND CROSS, RAMANAGARAM TOWN,
RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT - 562 159.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. R B SADASIVAPPA., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. BENKI CHIDANANDA,
S/O LATE SRI. BENKI TIPPESWAMI,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
R/AT L-63, 3RD A MAIN, 1ST BLOCK,
RAMAKRISHNA NAGARA,
MYSORE – 570 022.
…RESPONDENT
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI
B S
Location:
High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:30000
CRL.A No. 697 of 2022
THIS CRL.A FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE
ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE
COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT OF THE FIRST APPELLATE COURT III ADDITIONAL
SESSIONS JUDGE, MSYURU DATED 01.04.2019, PASSED IN
CRL.A.NO.47/2019 AND CONSEQUENTLY, SETTING ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED 25.01.2019, PASSED BY
THE IV ADDITIONAL FIRST CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C.
MYSURU, IN C.C.NO.1984/2015 AND BE PLEASED TO ALLOW
THE ABOVE.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Despite giving sufficient opportunities office objections have not been complied with.
Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed for not complying office objections.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5