Karnataka High Court

MFA/7128/2025 of SMT. LAKSHMAMMA Vs SRI JAGADEEHSHA on 17 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:29549 MFA No. 7128 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7128 OF 2025(MV-I) BETWEEN: SMT. LAKSHMAMMA, W/O VENKATACHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7128 OF 2025(MV-I)

BETWEEN:

SMT. LAKSHMAMMA,

W/O VENKATACHALAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,

R/AT KAGIMADU VILLAGE,

ADARANGI POST, MAGADI TALUK,

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT,

MAGADI – 561 101.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. THIPPESWAMY B.C., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI. JAGADEEHSHA,

S/O MAHANTHAIAH,

KAGIMADU VILLAGE,

ADARANGI POST, KUDUR HOBLI,

MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT

(INSURED OF TRACTOR

BEARING NO. KA-34-TA-2391)

2.

SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO., LTD.,

NO. 5-5, 3RD FLOOR,

MONARCH CHAMBERS,

INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.

(INSURER OF TRACTOR

BEARING NO. KA-34-TA-2391)

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R2,

R1 SERVED)

Digitally

signed by

REKHA R

Location:

High Court

of Karnataka

HC-KAR

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:15.02.2025

PASSED IN MVC NO.2037/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE VII

ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND ACJM, MEMBER, MACT-3, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU, PARTLY

ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND

SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

This appeal is by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation, arising out of judgment and award dated 15.02.2021 in MVC.No.2037/2020 passed by the VII Additional SCJ and ACJM, Member, MACT-3, Bengaluru.1

2. The date of accident, involvement of vehicle, injuries sustained by the claimant and the liability to pay the compensation are not in dispute. The only dispute is with regard to quantum of compensation.

1 ‘Tribunal’ for short

HC-KAR

3. The parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Tribunal.

4. Heard, Sri.Thippeswamy B.C, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri.B.Pradeep, learned counsel for respondent No.2-Insurer. Respondent No.1 though served remained unrepresented.

5. Sri. Thippeswamy B.C, learned counsel with all vehemence submits that as per Ex.P6 Wound Certificate, the claimant has suffered fracture of left body of Mandible B/L ZF-NOE-Zygomatic Arches-Dentoalvveolar Frontal bone fracture with right eye Globe rupture and other bleeding injuries all over the body and as per the opinion of the Doctor the injuries suffered are grievous in nature. The Tribunal has awarded total compensation of Rs.1,67,240/- out of which, Rs.77,240/- is towards medial expenses. The compensation awarded under other heads are inadequate and requires re-consideration.

6. Though Sri. B.Pradeep, opposed the arguments of Sri. Thippeswamy B.C, however he is not in serious

HC-KAR

dispute with regard to the fractures suffered, the period of treatment taken i.e., for 21 days as inpatient, as well as the medical expenses.

7. Having considered the rival submissions and in view of the fractures suffered and the opinion of the Doctor as per Ex.P6, if a global compensation of Rs.50,000/- is awarded along with 6% interest p.a., from the date of petition till realization, the same would meet the ends of justice. For the foregoing reasons, this Court proceeds to pass the following:

ORDER

i) Appeal is allowed-in-part. ii) The judgment and award dated 15.02.2021 in MVC.No.2037/2020 passed by the VII Additional SCJ and ACJM, Member, MACT-3, Bengaluru, is modified and enhanced to Rs.50,000/- at 6% p.a., from the date of petition till realization.

HC-KAR

iii) The respondent No.2/Insurer shall deposit entire compensation amount along with interest within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order before the concerned Tribunal. iv) Upon deposit, the entire amount shall be released in favour of the claimant on proper identification.

Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

PK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead