Karnataka High Court

CRL.A/2339/2025 of RAMACHANDRAPPA V Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 17 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:29648 CRL.A No. 2339 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2339 OF 2025 BETWEEN: RAMACHANDRAPPA V S/O VEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS BYALAMARADHODDI VILLAGE, JIGANI

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2339 OF 2025

BETWEEN:

RAMACHANDRAPPA V

S/O VEERAPPA

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

BYALAMARADHODDI VILLAGE,

JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,

BENGALURU - 560 083

CURRENTLY RESIDING AT

NO.351, 5TH MAIN ROAD,

2ND STAGE, 3RD BLOCK,

BASAVESHWARNAGARA,

BANGALORE, KARNATAKA - 560 079

…APPELLANT

(BY M/S. T CHANVI MADAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR

SRI. AIYAPPA K.G., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

THROUGH RAMANAGARA RURAL POLICE STATION

REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

HIGH COURT BUILDING,

BENGALURU - 560 001.

2.

NAGESH

SON OF NAGAMAHADEVAPPA

Digitally signed

by

SHARADAVANI

B

Location: High

Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NAGALAPURA,

CHIKKENAHALLI VILLAGE, KALIANCHA HOBLI

RAMANAGARA TALUK

KARNATAKA - 562 159

3.

MURALI C. G.

SON OF GOPAL C. N.

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

BEHIND SHANTHINIKENTAN COLLEGE,

VIVEKANANDA NAGAR, RAMANAGARA TALUK

KARNATAKA - 562 159

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. M.V. ANOOP KUMAR, HCGP FOR R1

SRI. A.N. RADHAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)

THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, 2015 BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT/S PRAYING THAT

THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE

ORDER DATED 30.05.2025 IN CRL.MISC NO.321/2025 PASSED

BY THE LD I

ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,

RAMANAGARA FOUND AT ANNEXURE-H ARISING OUT OF FIR

IN CR NO.225/2024 FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 109(1), 115(2), 118, 126(2), 351 AND 352 OF THE BNS 2023 R/W

SECTION 3(2)(5) OF THE SCHEDULED CAST/SCHEDULED

TRIBE (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES ) ACT 1989 FILED BY THE

RAMANAGARA RURAL POLICE STATION.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

HC-KAR

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

Learned counsel appearing for the appellant files a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to file the cancellation of the bail before the same Court. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

The Advocate for Appellant humbly submits that the Appellant be permitted to withdraw the Appeal with liberty to file cancellation of bail before this Hon'ble Court and set aside of bail before Trial Court in the interest of justice and equity."

In terms of memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead