Karnataka High Court
WP/15695/2026 of M/S VIJAYAS VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, Vs SMT. JAYASHEELA G HOMBAL, on 16 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:29078-DB WP No. 15695 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 15695 OF 2026 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: 1. M/S VIJAYAS VENTURES PRIVATE
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
WRIT PETITION NO. 15695 OF 2026 (GM-CON)
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S VIJAYAS VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,
A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER
COMPANIES ACT, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT
NO.999-A, 2ND FLOOR,
PERODY HOUSE,
BILEKAHALLI,
VIJAYA BANK LAYOUT,
BENGALURU- 560 076,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR,
SRI. G B VIJAYA KUMAR,
AGED 43 YEARS,
SON OF SRI. NARASHIMHAPPA
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. N JAGADISH BALIGA., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. JAYASHEELA G HOMBAL,
AGED 52 YEARS,
WIFE OF SRI. GURUPRASAD SHIVAPUTRA HOMBAL, RESIDING AT NO. B-304, B- BLOCK, 3RD FLOOR, VIJAYAS VAIBHAV APARTMENT, 12TH CROSS, R K TOWNSHIP,
Digitally
signed by
VASANTHA
KUMARY B K
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
YARANDAHALLI,
BOMMASANDRA,
BOMMASANDRA INDUSTRIAL AREA,
BENGALURU 560 099
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. BRIAN CRISPIN REGO., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR
DIRECTION AND THEREBY QUASH FINAL ORDER DATED
20.02.2026 PASSED BY THE NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTE
REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI IN FIRST APPEAL No.
755/2021 AT ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE
FINAL ORDER DATED 04.12.2020 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA
STATE
CONSUMER
DISPUTE
REDRESSAL
COMMISSION,
BENGALURU (PRINCIPAL BENCH) IN COMPLIANT No. 276/2018
AT ANNEXRE-B AND THEREBY DISMISS COMPLIANT FILED BY
THE RESPONDENT PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C, ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present writ petition has been filed impugning the order dated 20.02.2026 passed by the National Consumer
HC-KAR
Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, whereby the petitioner has been directed to pay Rs.10,00,000/- along with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the order of the State Commission to the respondent-claimant.
2. During the pendency of this writ petition, the parties have settled the dispute amicably outside the Court. The terms of the settlement are set out in the joint memo filed by the parties, which has been signed by them. The joint memo has also been signed by their respective counsel. The parties who are present in the Court are identified by their respective counsel. The settlement has been arrived at without any force, coercion or undue influence, and the parties stand by the terms of the compromise. The terms of compromise as set out in the joint memo read as under:
"1. That the Karnataka State Consumer Redressal Commission, Bengaluru in Comlaint No.276/2018 filed by the Respondent for various reliefs allowed the Complaint and directed the petitioner to pay Rs.15,40,000/- along with interest at 9% per annum after expiry of 2 month and Rs.1,00,000/- with interest at 9% per annum towards Rent and Rs.50,000/- towards the mental agony and stress by the Order dated 04.12.2020.
HC-KAR
2. That challenging the said order, the petitioner filed First Appeal No.755/2021 before the National Consumer Redressal Commission, New Delhi. After hearing, the National Commission by the Order dated 20.02.2026 modified the Order of the State Commission and directed the Petitioner to pay Rs.10,00,000/- along with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the order of the State Commission.
3. That challenging both the final orders, the petitioner filed this petition. By the order dated 21.05.2026, this Court was pleased to direct issue notice to the respondent and grant stay subject the petitioner deposits Rs.5,00,000/- on or before 18.06.2026.
4. That by intervention of well-wishers, friends and their respective counsels, the parties amicably settled their dispute. Towards the full and final claim of the respondent in respect of the Complaint No.276/2018 and Execution Petition No.33/2021 of the State Commission, the petitioner agree to pay Rs.6,00,000/-(Rupees Six Lakhs only) to the respondent and the respondent admitted the settlement of his clam subject to payment of Rs.6,00,000/-(Rupees Six Lakhs only) by the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner issued Demand Draft bearing No.569393 dated 11.06.2026 drawn on State Bank of India, BTM 4th stage, Bengaluru in favour of the respondent for Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupess Six Lakhs only). The respondent hereby acknowledges the receipt of the said Demand Draft before the Court.
5. That in view of the settlement and the payment, no dispute is pending between the parties
HC-KAR
in respect of the Complaint No.276/2018. The copy of the Demand Draft is enclosed herewith.
6. Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dispose the petition as settled out of Court by holding the claim of the respondent is fully satisfied, in the interests of justice and equity."
3. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stand disposed of in terms of the settlement between the parties as set out in the joint memo.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
RKA List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6