Karnataka High Court

RFA/990/2014 of SRI B N VASU Vs SRI GANGADHARA B N on 15 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:28989-DB RFA No. 990 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 990 OF 2014 (PAR/DEC-) BETWEEN: SRI. B.N. VASU, S/O SRI.

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 990 OF 2014 (PAR/DEC-)

BETWEEN:

SRI. B.N. VASU,

S/O SRI. B.NANJAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

R/AT HIRIDEVI TEMPLE ROAD,

BELAGOLA VILLAGE & HOBLI,

SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK,

MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 606.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. K.M. SOMASHEKARA., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI GANGADHARA B.N.,

S/O SRI D.NANJAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

NARASIMHASWAMY TEMPLE ROAD,

BELAGOLA,

SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK,

MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 606.

2.

SRI. D.NANJAPPA,

S/O LATE P.DEVARAJEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,

NARASIMHASWAMY TEMPLE ROAD,

SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK,

MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 606.

Digitally

signed by

REKHA R

Location:

High Court

of Karnataka

HC-KAR

3.

SMT.LAKSHMAMMA,

W/O SRI. D.NANJAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,

R/AT HIRIDEVI TEMPLE ROAD,

BELAGOLA VILLAGE, & HOBLI,

SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK,

MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 606.

4.

SMT. YASHODA B.N.,

W/O SRI. SHANKARANANDA,

R/AT KYATANAHALLI VILLAGE,

(ANANDA RADIO CENTRE)

PANDAVAPURA TALUK,

MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 427.

5.

SMT. INDIRAMMA B.N.,

SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS

SRI. N.SRINIVAS,

S/O LATE SRI. NARASIMHEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,

6.

SRI. CHETHANAPRASAD M.S.,

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

7.

KUM.SUSHMITHA M.S.,

AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,

RESPONDENT NO.5 IS THE HUSBAND

& NOS.6 & 7 ARE THE CHILDREN OF

LATE SMT. INDIRAMMA B.N.,

R5 TO R7 ARE R/AT

DO.NO.56, 2ND MAIN,

MAHAJANA LAYOUT,

MYSORE - 560 040.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. D.C. DEEPAK, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R7, R1, R2 AND R3 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

HC-KAR

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED:15.03.2014 PASSED IN OS

NO.36/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE

(SR.DN)

SRIRANGAPATNA,

ORDERING

TO

DRAW

FINAL

DECREE IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE PETITION.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)

The present appeal under Section 96 r/w Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, impugning the judgment and decree dated 15.03.2014 in O.S.No.36/2011 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Srirangapatna.

2. The appellant who was defendant No.5 has got the final decree registered and pursuance to the final decree, he has disposed of one property which came to his share vide sale deed dated 11.08.2016. This fact has been brought on record by the respondent Nos.4 to 7 by filing

HC-KAR

application Under Order XLI Rule 27 r/w Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. These documents are not disputed. Suffice the appellant himself has got the final decree registered and acted upon. Since the documents are not disputed and they are subsequent to the judgment and decree, the application I.A.No.1/2024 is allowed, as the same comes within the purview of the provisions contemplated Order XLI Rule 27 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

3. We find no merit in this appeal and accordingly, dismissed.

Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE

Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26 ct-vn

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead