Karnataka High Court
RFA/1145/2018 of B SIDDESH Vs SMT MAYAMAM on 15 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:28963-DB RFA No. 1145 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1145 OF 2018 (PAR-) BETWEEN: B.SIDDESH, S/O LATE B. BORAIAH,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1145 OF 2018 (PAR-)
BETWEEN:
B.SIDDESH,
S/O LATE B. BORAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/O 3RD CROSS,
GURGIGUDI EXTENSION,
SHIVAMOGGA CITY - 577 201.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. PRASAD B S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. MAYAMMA,
W/O LATE G.BORAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
R/O 3RD CROSS,
DURGIGUDI EXTENSION,
SHIMOGA CITY - 577 201.
2.
G.B. SURESH,
S/O LATE G.S. BORAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
OCC:BANANA BUSINESS,
R/O 3RD CROSS,
DURGIGUDI EXTENSION,
Digitally
signed by
REKHA R
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
SHIMOGA CITY - 577 201.
3.
SMT. RUKMINI,
W/O RAMESH,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/O GANDULING KOPPALU,
BINDENAHALLI VILLAGE - 571 445.
NAGAMANGALA TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2, R3 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96(1) OF CPC, 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:14.03.2018
PASSED
IN
OS.NO.67/2012
ON
THE
FILE
OF
THE
I
ADDL.SENIOR
CIVIL
JUDGE
AND
CJM,
SHIVAMOGGA,
DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE
POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a Memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
In view of the Memo, appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
DR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7 ct-vn