Karnataka High Court
WP/8639/2023 of KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA Vs SRI M BASAVARAJU on 12 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:28640-DB WP No. 8639 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 8639 OF 2023 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REP BY ITS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
WRIT PETITION NO. 8639 OF 2023 (S-KSAT)
BETWEEN:
KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA
REP BY ITS REGISTRAR,
M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU-5600 01.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN REDDY K.S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI M BASAVARAJU
S/O LATE.A.MAHADEVAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
RETIRED DEPUTY DIRECTOR
OF HORTICULTURE(ZP),
MYSORE DISTRICT,
R/AT NO. 323, 2ND CROSS,
6TH MAIN, 'H' BLOCK,
RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR,
MYSORE-570 022.
2.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
TO THE GOVERNMENT
DEPARTMENT OF HORTICULTURE
Digitally signed
by PANKAJA S
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU-560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHADEVAPPA PALLED, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. HARISHA A.S, AGA FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE
A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR
DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT THEREBY QUASHING
THE ORDER DATED 07-02-2020 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA
STATE
ADMINISTRATIVE
TRIBUNAL
AT
BENGALURU
IN
APPLICATION No. 6793/2018, AS PER ANNEXURE AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Heard, learned counsel Sri. Mallikarjun Reddy K.S., for the petitioner, learned counsel Sri. Mahadevappa Palled, for respondent No.1. and learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.2.
HC-KAR
2. It is submitted that the petitioner/Lokayukta is before this Court questioning the order dated 07.02.2020 in Application No.6793/2018 (Annexure-A) passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru, wherein the Tribunal has set aside the articles of charge and order dated 28.09.2017 bearing No.UPLOK- 1/DE/633/2017/A.Ni.V-7 and order of entrust bearing No.ToEi 28 ToSePa 2017 dated 26.04.2017 with liberty to the Government to initiate fresh action, if so advised.
3. However, the learned counsel appearing for the parties would bring to the notice of this Court that in pursuant to the said direction of the Tribunal, the State Government passed fresh order dated 18.03.2021 (produced along with affidavit dated 11.06.2026 by the petitioner/Lokayukta) entrusting the enquiry against respondent No.1 herein to the petitioner/Lokayukta. It is submitted that fresh enquiry was conducted and respondent No.1 herein was not found guilty. Accordingly, the State Government passed government order dated
HC-KAR
29.12.2023, exonerated respondent No.1. Therefore, it is submitted that the writ petition would not survive. Submissions of the learned counsel are placed on record.
The writ petition is disposed of as it would not survive for consideration. SD/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE CR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39