Karnataka High Court
MFA/2826/2026 of SRI DAMODARA M D Vs SMT. BRUNDA R on 11 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:28368-DB MFA No. 2826 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2826 OF 2026 (FC) BETWEEN: SRI DAMODARA M D AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:28368-DB
MFA No. 2826 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2826 OF 2026 (FC)
BETWEEN:
SRI DAMODARA M D
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
S/O. LATE DODDEGOWDA
R/O. NO.1011, 14TH CROSS
2ND STAGE, KAVERI CIRCLE
HEBBAL, MYSURU
PIN-570027
AND PRESENTLY AT KABINI APARTMENT
T-1, 3RD FLOOR, 10TH CROSS
SUBHASHNAGAR
KENGERI SATELLITE TOWN
BENGALURU - 560 060
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. PRIYADARSHINI C., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
SMT. BRUNDA R
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
W/O. DAMODARA M.D.
D/O. RAMALINGU
RESIDENT OF NO. 1700
SEETHARAMA ROAD
HULLINA BEEDI, K.R. MOHALLA
MYSORE-570 004
AND ALSO PRESENTLY AT NO.25,
Digitally
signed by
VASANTHA
KUMARY B
K
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:28368-DB
MFA No. 2826 of 2026
DGM COLONY PREETI LAYOUT,
SRIRAMPURA MYSURU - 570 023
…RESPONDENT
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 19(1) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT
ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.06.2025
PASSED IN MC NO. 1161/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE II
ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT MYSURU, DISMISSING
THE
PETITION
FILED
UNDER
SECTION
13(1)(ia)(ib) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
Neither the appellant nor learned counsel for the appellant are present in the first call or in the revised call.
2. Therefore, we have no option but to dismiss this appeal for non-prosecution. SD/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
SD/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
NG CT:SN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6