Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/351/2022 of D V HARISH Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 11 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:28373 CRL.A No. 351 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 351 OF 2022 ( A ) BETWEEN: 1. D V HARISH S/O LATE DODDAPPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/ A VADAGURU, KEMBODI
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 351 OF 2022 (A)
BETWEEN:
1.
D V HARISH
S/O LATE DODDAPPAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
R/A VADAGURU,
KEMBODI POST,
KOLAR TALUK,
KOLAR - 563 103.
2.
SHYAMALA
W/O D.V. HARISH,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/O VADAGURU,
KEMBODI POST,
KOLAR TALUK,
KOLAR - 563 103.
3.
RATHNAMMA
W/O LATE DODDAPPAIAH,
AGED BOUT 60 YEARS,
R/A VADAGURU,
KEMBODI POST,
KOLAR TALUK,
KOLAR - 563 103.
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI
B S
Location:
High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
4.
NANJUNDAPPA
S/O ULLEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/O BOMMASANDRA,
KOLAR TALUK,
KOLAR - 563 101.
5.
AIYAPPA
S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/O KAMBODI KOLAR TALUK,
KOLAR - 563 101.
6.
SONNAPPA
S/O LATE MUNISHAMPPA,
AGE ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/A VADAGURU,
KEMBODI POST,
KOLAR TALUK,
KOLAR - 563 103.
7.
RAGHU
S/O SONNAPPA,
AGE ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/A VADAGURU,
KEMBODI POST,
KOLAR TALUK,
KOLAR - 563 103.
8.
VENKATESHAPPA
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA,
AGE ABOUT 55 YEARS,
R/A VADAGURU,
KEMBODI POST,
KOLAR TALUK,
KOLAR - 563 103.
HC-KAR
9.
G H KRISHNAPPA
S/O HANUMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/A GEERNAHALLI,
KOLAR TALUK,
KOLAR - 563 101.
10.
BALAKRISHNA
S/O MUNIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/A KAMANOORU,
DEVARAYASAMUDRA POST,
MULBAGAL TALUK,
KOLAR - 563 127.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. RAHUL S REDDY., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
KOLAR RURAL CIRCLE,
KOLAR,
REP BY S.P.P.,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. M V ANOOPKUMAR., HCGP)
----
THIS CRL.RP FILED U/S.378(4) OF CR.P.C BY THE
ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE
COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE OBSERVATION
AND THE DIRECTION GIVEN TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
HC-KAR
OFFICER
OF
DISTRICT
COURT,
KOLAR
TO
SUBMIT
A
COMPLAINT BEFORE THE JURISDICTIONAL MAGISTRATE TO
INITIATE ACTION AGAINST THE WITNESSES WHO ARE THE
APPELLANTS HEREIN FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S.193 OF THE
IPC IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW AS PER THE PROCEDURE
CONTEMPLATED
U/S.195(1)(b)(i)
R/W
CR.PC
IN
JUDGMENT DATED 16.04.2021 IN S.C.NO.66/2007, 135/2012
AND 95/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT
AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT KOLAR AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Despite being given sufficient opportunities, the appellants failed to comply with the office objections. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
JS/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3