Karnataka High Court

CRL.A/351/2022 of D V HARISH Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 11 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:28373 CRL.A No. 351 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 351 OF 2022 ( A ) BETWEEN: 1. D V HARISH S/O LATE DODDAPPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/ A VADAGURU, KEMBODI

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 351 OF 2022 (A)

BETWEEN:

1.

D V HARISH

S/O LATE DODDAPPAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

R/A VADAGURU,

KEMBODI POST,

KOLAR TALUK,

KOLAR - 563 103.

2.

SHYAMALA

W/O D.V. HARISH,

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

R/O VADAGURU,

KEMBODI POST,

KOLAR TALUK,

KOLAR - 563 103.

3.

RATHNAMMA

W/O LATE DODDAPPAIAH,

AGED BOUT 60 YEARS,

R/A VADAGURU,

KEMBODI POST,

KOLAR TALUK,

KOLAR - 563 103.

Digitally

signed by

SUSHMA

LAKSHMI

B S

Location:

High

Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

4.

NANJUNDAPPA

S/O ULLEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

R/O BOMMASANDRA,

KOLAR TALUK,

KOLAR - 563 101.

5.

AIYAPPA

S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

R/O KAMBODI KOLAR TALUK,

KOLAR - 563 101.

6.

SONNAPPA

S/O LATE MUNISHAMPPA,

AGE ABOUT 50 YEARS,

R/A VADAGURU,

KEMBODI POST,

KOLAR TALUK,

KOLAR - 563 103.

7.

RAGHU

S/O SONNAPPA,

AGE ABOUT 35 YEARS,

R/A VADAGURU,

KEMBODI POST,

KOLAR TALUK,

KOLAR - 563 103.

8.

VENKATESHAPPA

S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA,

AGE ABOUT 55 YEARS,

R/A VADAGURU,

KEMBODI POST,

KOLAR TALUK,

KOLAR - 563 103.

HC-KAR

9.

G H KRISHNAPPA

S/O HANUMAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

R/A GEERNAHALLI,

KOLAR TALUK,

KOLAR - 563 101.

10.

BALAKRISHNA

S/O MUNIYAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

R/A KAMANOORU,

DEVARAYASAMUDRA POST,

MULBAGAL TALUK,

KOLAR - 563 127.

…APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. RAHUL S REDDY., ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

KOLAR RURAL CIRCLE,

KOLAR,

REP BY S.P.P.,

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

BENGALURU - 560 001.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. M V ANOOPKUMAR., HCGP)

----

THIS CRL.RP FILED U/S.378(4) OF CR.P.C BY THE

ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE

COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE OBSERVATION

AND THE DIRECTION GIVEN TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE

HC-KAR

OFFICER

OF

DISTRICT

COURT,

KOLAR

TO

SUBMIT

A

COMPLAINT BEFORE THE JURISDICTIONAL MAGISTRATE TO

INITIATE ACTION AGAINST THE WITNESSES WHO ARE THE

APPELLANTS HEREIN FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S.193 OF THE

IPC IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW AS PER THE PROCEDURE

CONTEMPLATED

U/S.195(1)(b)(i)

R/W

CR.PC

IN

JUDGMENT DATED 16.04.2021 IN S.C.NO.66/2007, 135/2012

AND 95/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT

AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT KOLAR AND ETC.,

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

Despite being given sufficient opportunities, the appellants failed to comply with the office objections. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

JS/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead