Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/1852/2022 of MRS REKHA AMARLAL Vs MR NIKHIL KUMAR GUPTA on 11 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:28156 CRL.A No. 1852 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1852 OF 2022 ( A ) BETWEEN: MRS. REKHA AMARLAL W/O LATE AMARLAL, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, PROPRIETRIX: M/S
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:28156
CRL.A No. 1852 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1852 OF 2022 (A)
BETWEEN:
MRS. REKHA AMARLAL
W/O LATE AMARLAL,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
PROPRIETRIX: M/S SEWARAM AASHISH KUMAR,
NO.402, JANAK RESIDENCY, 2,
KUMAR KRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001
REPRESENTED BY HER GENERAL POWER OF
ATTORNEY MR. AASHISH AMARLAL.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. S.V. GIRIDHAR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
MR. NIKHIL KUMAR GUPTA
S/O NARENDRA KUMAR GUPTA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/AT NO.11, 1ST MAIN, 3RD CROSS,
AMBEDKAR LAYOUT,
(TELECOM LAYOUT)
KEMPAPURA, AGRAHARA,
BENGALURU-560023.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 397 AND 401 CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE
COURT OF THE LXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY, BANGALORE DATED
10.02.2020 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.547/2016 AND
CONSEQUENTLY UPHOLD THE JUDGMENT OF THE SMALL
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI
B S
Location:
High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:28156
CRL.A No. 1852 of 2022
CAUSE JUDGE XXVI ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE
COURT,
AT
BANGALORE
IN
C.C.NO.17898/2013
DATED
01.04.2016,
AND
CONAEQUENTLY CONVICT THE ACCUSED/RESPONDENT
HEREIN AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Case called out. None appears for the appellant.
2. Despite giving sufficient opportunity, the appellant has not complied with the office-objections.
3. Hence, the criminal appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office-objections.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5