Karnataka High Court

CRL.A/1852/2022 of MRS REKHA AMARLAL Vs MR NIKHIL KUMAR GUPTA on 11 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:28156 CRL.A No. 1852 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1852 OF 2022 ( A ) BETWEEN: MRS. REKHA AMARLAL W/O LATE AMARLAL, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, PROPRIETRIX: M/S

HC-KAR

NC: 2026:KHC:28156

CRL.A No. 1852 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1852 OF 2022 (A)

BETWEEN:

MRS. REKHA AMARLAL

W/O LATE AMARLAL,

AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,

PROPRIETRIX: M/S SEWARAM AASHISH KUMAR,

NO.402, JANAK RESIDENCY, 2,

KUMAR KRUPA ROAD,

BENGALURU-560001

REPRESENTED BY HER GENERAL POWER OF

ATTORNEY MR. AASHISH AMARLAL.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. S.V. GIRIDHAR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

AND:

MR. NIKHIL KUMAR GUPTA

S/O NARENDRA KUMAR GUPTA,

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

R/AT NO.11, 1ST MAIN, 3RD CROSS,

AMBEDKAR LAYOUT,

(TELECOM LAYOUT)

KEMPAPURA, AGRAHARA,

BENGALURU-560023.

…RESPONDENT

THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 397 AND 401 CR.P.C

PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE

COURT OF THE LXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND

SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY, BANGALORE DATED

10.02.2020 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.547/2016 AND

CONSEQUENTLY UPHOLD THE JUDGMENT OF THE SMALL

Digitally

signed by

SUSHMA

LAKSHMI

B S

Location:

High

Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

NC: 2026:KHC:28156

CRL.A No. 1852 of 2022

CAUSE JUDGE XXVI ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN

MAGISTRATE

COURT,

AT

BANGALORE

IN

C.C.NO.17898/2013

DATED

01.04.2016,

AND

CONAEQUENTLY CONVICT THE ACCUSED/RESPONDENT

HEREIN AND ETC.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

Case called out. None appears for the appellant.

2. Despite giving sufficient opportunity, the appellant has not complied with the office-objections.

3. Hence, the criminal appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office-objections.

Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

NR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead