Karnataka High Court

CRL.A/725/2025 of TIPPU SULTHAN Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 10 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:27835 CRL.A No. 725 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 725 OF 2025 (C) BETWEEN: TIPPU SULTHAN SON OF KHALANDAR SAB, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS OLD, RESIDING AT

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 725 OF 2025 (C)

BETWEEN:

TIPPU SULTHAN

SON OF KHALANDAR SAB,

AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS OLD,

RESIDING AT

SHEKHARAPPA NAGARA,

DAVANGERE – 577 002.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. NEERAJ RAJIV SHIVAM., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY WOMEN POLICE STATION,

DAVANGERE - 577 002.

REPRESENTED BY

THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

BENGALURU - 560 001.

2.

MS. XXXXXXX

D/O LATE KARANAPPA GOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,

Digitally

signed by

SUSHMA

LAKSHMI

B S

Location:

High Court

of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

REPRESENTED BY

HER GUARDIAN MOTHER,

Mrs. SAROJAMMA,

W/O LATE KARANAPPA GOWDA,

RESIDING AT NO.A, BLOCK,

SHEKHARAPPA NAGARA,

3RD CROSS,

DAVANGERE - 577 002.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY Ms. ASMA KOUSER., ADDL. SPP FOR R1)

----

THIS CRL.A FILED U/S 374(2) CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE

FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT

DATED 04.01.2025 PASSED IN SPL.C.NO.576/2023 BY THE

LEARNED ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-I

DAVANAGERE, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 323, 354, 345(A) OF

IPC 1860 AND SECTION.8 AND 12 OF POCSO ACT, 2012. SET

ASIDE THE ORDER OF SENTENCE DATED 06.01.2025 PASSED

IN SPL.C.NO.576/2023 BY THE LEARNED ADDL. DISTRICT AND

SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-I DAVANAGERE.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL ORDERS, THIS

DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

HC-KAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Case called out.

2. No representation on behalf of the parties.

3. Accordingly, this criminal appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.

Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

NM/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead