Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/725/2025 of TIPPU SULTHAN Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 10 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:27835 CRL.A No. 725 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 725 OF 2025 (C) BETWEEN: TIPPU SULTHAN SON OF KHALANDAR SAB, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS OLD, RESIDING AT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 725 OF 2025 (C)
BETWEEN:
TIPPU SULTHAN
SON OF KHALANDAR SAB,
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS OLD,
RESIDING AT
SHEKHARAPPA NAGARA,
DAVANGERE – 577 002.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NEERAJ RAJIV SHIVAM., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY WOMEN POLICE STATION,
DAVANGERE - 577 002.
REPRESENTED BY
THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
MS. XXXXXXX
D/O LATE KARANAPPA GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI
B S
Location:
High Court
of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
REPRESENTED BY
HER GUARDIAN MOTHER,
Mrs. SAROJAMMA,
W/O LATE KARANAPPA GOWDA,
RESIDING AT NO.A, BLOCK,
SHEKHARAPPA NAGARA,
3RD CROSS,
DAVANGERE - 577 002.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY Ms. ASMA KOUSER., ADDL. SPP FOR R1)
----
THIS CRL.A FILED U/S 374(2) CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE
FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
DATED 04.01.2025 PASSED IN SPL.C.NO.576/2023 BY THE
LEARNED ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-I
DAVANAGERE, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 323, 354, 345(A) OF
IPC 1860 AND SECTION.8 AND 12 OF POCSO ACT, 2012. SET
ASIDE THE ORDER OF SENTENCE DATED 06.01.2025 PASSED
IN SPL.C.NO.576/2023 BY THE LEARNED ADDL. DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC-I DAVANAGERE.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL ORDERS, THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Case called out.
2. No representation on behalf of the parties.
3. Accordingly, this criminal appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NM/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8