Karnataka High Court
WP/16185/2026 of M/S HARMONY ARCHITECTS Vs B S SUDHARSHAN on 10 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:27854-DB WP No. 16185 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 16185 OF 2026 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: 1. M/S HARMONY ARCHITECTS REP. BY ITS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
WRIT PETITION NO. 16185 OF 2026 (GM-CON)
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S HARMONY ARCHITECTS
REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR,
SMT. JAYASHRI KIREETI.
2.
SRI K.R. SRIKANTA PRASAD
S/O LATE SRI K RAMASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF
NO.273/TF1, SHANKARA
5TH MAIN, NEAR NPS BSK BRANCH
BANGALORE-560 061.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA RAO K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
B.S. SUDHARSHAN
S/O C.S. SHASHIKUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 805, 8TH MAIN ROAD,
C BLOCK, 3RD STAGE, VIJAYANAGARA,
MYSURU-570 017.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
Digitally
signed by
REKHA R
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE
WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA
STATE
CONSUMER
DISPUTES
REDRESSAL
COMMISSION
BANGALORE (ADDL. BENCH) IN APPEAL NO.322/2019 DATED
24.02.2026, FOUND AT ANNEXURE-K, ALLOW THIS WRIT
PETITION WITH COSTS AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS
THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT, IN THE
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE
AND EQUITY.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) The present Writ Petition has been filed impugning the order dated 24.02.2026 passed by the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Appeal No.322/2019, preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 31.01.2019 passed by the District Consumer Forum, Mysore.
2. The petitioners have an efficacious statutory remedy available under the Consumer Protection Act,
HC-KAR
2019 to file Revision against the order passed by the State Commission.
3. In view of availability of the efficacious statutory remedy to the petitioners, we do not incline to entertain this Writ Petition. Therefore, we dismiss the Writ Petition at threshold, with liberty to the petitioners to approach the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in appropriate proceedings against the impugned order passed by the State Commission.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3