Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/557/2011 of INTELLIGENCE OFFICER Vs MOHAMMED ARIF RAHMAN @ BAWA on 9 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:27350 CRL.A No. 557 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 557 OF 2011 ( A ) BETWEEN: INTELLIGENCE OFFICER NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, SOUTH ZONAL UNIT, CHENNAI - 600
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 557 OF 2011 (A)
BETWEEN:
INTELLIGENCE OFFICER
NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU,
SOUTH ZONAL UNIT,
CHENNAI - 600 090.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MADHUKAR DESHPANDE., CGSC)
AND:
1.
MOHAMMED ARIF RAHMAN @ BAWA
S/O.V REHMAN,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
R/O.SUANAIR, NAVARDIA,
ITWARIA MOHALLA, SHAHJIPUR,
MADHYA PRADESH.
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI B
S
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
MANZOOR HUSSAIN @ RAJU
S/O.U KHAZI,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
134 B, NIZAMMUDDIN COLONY,
NEAR INDRAPURI MAIN ROAD,
BHEL BHOPAL,
MADHYA PRADESH
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MANJUNATH G., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
----
THIS CRL.A. FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C BY THE STATE
P.P. FOR THE STATE PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT
MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT DATED
29.11.2010 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE XXXIII
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUSGE AND SPL.
JUDGE (NDPS), BANGALORE IN SPL.C.C.NO.164/2007.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
On the last date of hearing i.e., on 12.06.2025, two weeks time was granted for execution of bailable warrant against respondent No.1. However, till today steps not taken.
2. Having considered the in-action of the learned counsel for the appellant and also that this is an old matter, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2