Karnataka High Court
MFA/2264/2024 of SMT PREMA T P Vs SRI NAGESH H B on 9 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:27588-DB MFA No. 2264 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2264 OF 2024 (FC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT PREMA T P W/O NAGESH H
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2264 OF 2024 (FC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT PREMA T P
W/O NAGESH H B
D/O PANDURANGA T H
AGED 26 YEARS,
ADDRESS AS PER TRAIL COURT RECORD
C/L RUDRAKSHI P.G.
JAYANAGARA, RING ROAD,
OPP KTM SHOW ROOM
CHIKKAHONNENAHALLI ROAD,
S.B.I. BANK,
HASSAN-573201.
NOW RESIDING AT,
HOUSEHOLD, R/O 2ND CROSS,
BANASHANKARI BADAVANE
OPPOSITE TO KEB OFFICE,
M G ROAD,
TARIKERE TOWN - 577228
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. YATHISHA K J., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
SRI NAGESH H B
S/O BASAVANAIKA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
Digitally
signed by
VASANTHA
KUMARY B K
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
FIREMAN, FIRE AND EMERGENCY
RESCUE SERVICES DEPT.,
DISTRICT FIRE AND EMERGENCY
RESCUE SERVICES,
DAIRY CIRCLE, B M ROAD,
HASSAN - 573201.
…RESPONDENT
(BY Ms. SANDHYA D., ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY
COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
08.09.2023 PASSED IN M.C.NO. 311/2022 ON THE FILE OF
THE
PRINCIPAL
JUDGE,
FAMILY
COURT,
HASSAN,
ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1)(i-a) OF
THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The case has been taken in the revised call. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant in the first call as well as in revised call.
HC-KAR
2. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9