Karnataka High Court
WA/504/2026 of THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER on 9 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:27461-DB WA No. 504 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 504 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
WRIT APPEAL NO. 504 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR,
ANEKAL TALUK - 562 106
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. B. RAVINDRANATH, AGA)
AND:
1.
THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE SOUTH-SUB DIVISION,
BANGALORE - 560 009.
2.
SMT. VENKATAMMA,
W/O LATE MUNIKAVERAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
R/O GATTAHALLI VILLAGE,
SARJAPURA HOBLI,
Digitally
signed by
REKHA R
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
ANEKAL TALUK,
BANGALORE URBAN
DISTRICT - 560 099.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIVEK SUBBAREDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. K.N. SUBBAREDDY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2)
THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
THE ORDER DATED:01.08.2025 PASSED IN WP NO.22978/2025
BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS
THE WRIT PETITION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT HEREIN AND
ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present intra Court appeal has been filed impugning the judgment and order dated 01.08.2025, passed by the Writ Court in W.P.No.22978/2025 filed by the respondents.
HC-KAR
2. Sri.B.Ravindranath, learned Additional Government Advocate submits that writ petition came to be allowed by the learned Single Judge without affording an opportunity to the respondents/appellants to file their statement of objections to the writ petition. They have taken this ground in this writ appeal that the impugned order has been passed without affording an opportunity to file statement of objections by placing true facts and material on record inasmuch as claim of respondent No.2.
3. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the appellants submits that this writ appeal may be allowed as no opportunity was granted to the appellants to file statement of objections, as the order has been passed without affording an opportunity to file the statement of objections.
4. Considering the aforesaid fact that no opportunity was granted to the appellants to file statement of objections, we set aside the impugned judgment and
HC-KAR
order and remand the matter back to the learned Single Judge. We direct the appellant to file their statement of objections within a period of two weeks from today. Let the parties be heard afresh and all contentions of the parties are kept open.
5. We request the learned Single Judge to take up the matter on urgent basis and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible. Accordingly, writ appeal is allowed.
In view of disposal of the writ appeal, pending interlocutory application/s if any, does not survive for consideration and the same is disposed of.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3 ct-vn