Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/1092/2013 of SRI A MURALIDHARA REDDY Vs SRI FAZLULLA KHAN on 9 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:27532 CRL.A No. 1092 of 2013 C/W CRL.A No. 1093 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1092 OF 2013 ( A ) C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1093 OF 2013 ( A ) IN CRL.A No.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1092 OF 2013 (A)
C/W
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1093 OF 2013 (A)
IN CRL.A No. 1092/2013
BETWEEN:
SRI A MURALIDHARA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
SON OF LATE SRI A C VENKATARAMAPPA,
RESIDING AT : #21/2,
PATEL SEETHAPPA COLONY,
8TH MAIN ROAD,
NEW THIPPASANDRA,
BANGALORE – 560 075.
…APPELLANT
(BY SMT. S.B.LAKSHMI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI FAZLULLA KHAN
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
SON OF SRI RASHEED KHAN
RESIDING AT: #19, 4TH CROSS
1ST MAIN, ANNASANDRAPALYA
BANGALORE – 560 017.
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI
B S
Location:
High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
ALSO AT:
M/S MISBA REAL ESTATE,
SHOP NO.9,
1ST MAIN
LAL BAHADUR SHASTRY NAGAR,
BANGALORE – 560 017.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. T. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
----
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO
SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL DATED 13.09.2013
PASSED
BY
THE
XIV
A.C.M.M.,
BANGALORE
IN
C.C.NO.26870/2011
-
ACQUITTING
THE
RESPONDENT
/
ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF NEGOTIABLE
INSTRUMENTS ACT.
IN CRL.A NO. 1093/2013
BETWEEN:
SRI. M JAYANNA
S/O LATE SRI. MALLE GOWDA,
RESIDING AT: 15, 1ST CROSS,
OPP. AKHTAR COMPOUND,
1ST MAIN, LAL BAHADUR
SHASTRY NAGAR,
BANGALORE – 560 017.
...APPELLANT
(BY SMT. S.B.LAKSHMI, ADVOCATE)
HC-KAR
AND:
SRI FAZLULLA KHAN
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
S/O SRI RASHEED KHAN,
RESIDING AT 19,
4TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN,
ANNASANDRAPALYA,
BANGALORE – 560 017.
ALSO AT:
M/S.MISBA REAL ESTATE, SHOP
NO.9, 1ST MAIN, LAL BAHADUR
SHASTRY NAGAR,
BANGALORE – 560 017.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. T. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
----
THIS CRL.A. FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO
SET
ASIDE
THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
OF ACQUITTAL DATED 13.09.2013 PASSED BY THE XIV A.C.M.M., MAYO HALL UNIT, BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.26628/2011 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT / ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTUMENTS ACT.
THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTELLEMENT, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
HC-KAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Heard Smt. S.B. Lakshmi, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri. T. Prakash, learned counsel for the common respondent, in both appeals.
2. Criminal Appeal No.1092/2013 is filed by the appellant / complainant seeking to set aside the judgment dated 13.09.2013 in C.C. No.26870/2011 passed by the XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall Unit, Bangalore.
3. Criminal Appeal No.1093/2013 is filed by the appellant / complainant seeking to set aside the judgment dated 13.09.2013 in C.C. No.26628/2011 passed by the XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall Unit, Bangalore.
4. Learned counsel for the appellants and the common respondent submit that the parties have settled the matters amicably in the mediation before the Karnataka Mediation Centre.
HC-KAR
5. The appellants and the respondent are present before this Court and they have been identified by their respective counsel.
6. As per the submission of the learned counsel for the respective parties, both parties have adhered to the terms and conditions stipulated in the mediation report. The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellants have received the amount as required to be paid and there is no balance amount remaining to be paid and the case may be disposed of. The submission is placed on record.
7. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following:
ORDER
The Criminal Appeals stand disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties before the Karnataka Mediation Centre. The efforts rendered by the learned counsel for respective parties are hereby appreciated.
HC-KAR
In view of the disposal the appeal, pending I.A., does not survive for consideration and the same is also disposed of. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
Bss List No.: 1 Sl No.: 56