Karnataka High Court

MFA/6632/2025 of SMT. A JYOTHI Vs SRI J PRABHAKAR RAO on 8 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:27356-DB MFA No. 6632 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6632 OF 2025 (FC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. A JYOTHI D/O

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6632 OF 2025 (FC)

BETWEEN:

1.

SMT. A JYOTHI

D/O R.L.ANNOJIRAO,

W/O PRABHAKAR RAO,

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

R/AT RANGENAHALLI VILLAGE,

SIDDESWARA ROAD, TARIKERE TALUK,

CHICKKAMGALURU DISTRICT-577228

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. M V MAHESWARAPPA., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI J PRABHAKAR RAO

S/O S.JAYASHEELA RAO,

AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,

R/AT SIDDAGANGA NILAYA,

BEHIND IYYAPPASWAMY TEMPLE,

GADIKOPPA, SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577201

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. UMESH P.B, ADVOCATE FOR

SRI. R.B.DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE)

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY

COURTS ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED

17.07.2025 PASSED IN MC NO. 35/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE

PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, SHIVAMOGGA, ALLOWING

THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(ia)(ib) (iii) OF THE

HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955.

Digitally

signed by

VASANTHA

KUMARY B

K

Location:

HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)

The present appeal has been filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 impugning the judgment and decree passed by the Family Court, Shivamogga in M.C.No.35/2015 whereby the Family Court has allowed the petition filed by the respondent/husband under Section 13(ia)(ib)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking dissolution of marriage on the grounds of cruelty, desertion and mental illness.

2. The marriage was solemnized between the parties on 25.10.1998. They have three children out of the wedlock. The paternity of two children has not been denied by the respondent-husband. However, in respect of the third child, the respondent has disputed the paternity. The Family Court, considering the evidence on record has granted decree of divorce and thus, the marriage solemnized between the parties

HC-KAR

on 25.10.1998 has been dissolved by the decree of divorce on the ground of desertion. The Family Court has also directed to pay Rs.10,00,000/- to the appellant-wife as permanent alimony.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant does not seriously dispute the findings of the Family Court regarding desertion. However, he submits that looking at the status of the respondent who is working as Senior Section Superintendent Engineer, the amount of alimony to meet the expenses of the wife and one minor child is meager, and therefore, he seeks enhancement of alimony.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent has supported the impugned judgment and order and submitted that the alimony of Rs.10,00,000/- awarded by the Family Court is just and proper. He further submits that since the two children who are with the respondent are of marriageable age, he needs to bear the expenses for the marriage of both the daughter and son. He also submits that alimony of Rs.10,00,000/- is just and proper which does not require any interference.

HC-KAR

5. We have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties.

6. The marriage between the appellant and respondent was solemnized way back in the year 1998 and after 27 years of their marriage, divorce petition came to be filed which has been allowed. Considering the fact that the respondent is well-employed and drawing a good salary in Government service, we enhance the alimony from Rs.10,00,000/- to 15,00,000/-. The present appeal stand disposed of on the following terms:

ORDER

i. The respondent shall pay permanent alimony of Rs.15,00,000/- towards full and final settlement of all claims of the respondent, whether for maintenance or otherwise. ii. The permanent alimony of Rs.15,00,000/- is directed to be paid in three equal installments. The first installment should be paid on or before 07.07.2026 and the second and third

HC-KAR

installments should be paid on or before 07.08.2026 and 07.09.2026 respectively.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE

Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead