Karnataka High Court

WA/397/2024 of SRI MUDALAGIRIYAPPA Vs DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER KSRTC on 5 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:26755-DB WA No. 397 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 397 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUDALAGIRIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

WRIT APPEAL NO. 397 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC)

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI MUDALAGIRIYAPPA

AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

B NO 494, DODDABALLAPURA DEPOT

REP BY GENERAL SECRETARY

KSRTC AND BMTC UNITED EMPLOYEES

UNION NO.23, 4TH MAIN ROAD,

MATHIKERE EXTENSION

BANGALORE 560 054

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. ADITHYA KASTURKAR, ADVOCATE FOR

SRI. ADITYA D., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER

KSRTC, RAMANAGARA DIVISION

KIMCO BUILDING

MYSORE ROAD,

DEEPANJALINAGAR

BANGALORE 560 026

…RESPONDENT

(BY Ms. RENUKA H R., ADVOCATE)

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA

HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED

24/08/2023 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP

NO.12302/2022, ETC.

Digitally

signed by

VASANTHA

KUMARY B K

Location:

HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)

The present intra Court appeal has been filed impugning the judgment and order dated 24.08.2023 passed by the writ Court in W.P.No.12302/2022 (L-KSRTC) filed by the respondent /Corporation.

2. The appellant was employed as a Conductor in the respondent/KSRTC (for short 'the Corporation'). He faced disciplinary enquiry in respect of the act of misconduct. The charge was proved in the enquiry. On 31.07.1993, the Disciplinary Authority inflicted punishment on the appellant for stopping of one annual increment for a period of six years with cumulative effect. This order of punishment came to be challenged by the appellant/workman in the year 2014 i.e., after 21 long years. Strangely, the Industrial Tribunal vide order dated 14.06.2021 set aside the order of punishment inflicted on the appellant on 31.07.1993.

HC-KAR

3. The said award passed by the Industrial Tribunal was challenged by the respondent/Corporation by filing W.P.No.12302/2022. The learned Single Judge has noted the fact that the Industrial Tribunal has set aside the award of punishment, which was inflicted on 31.07.1993 after 21 long years, for which the industrial dispute was raised.

4. We therefore, find no ground or error to interfere with the impugned judgment and order dated 24.08.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge, which is why we dismiss this appeal.

Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE

Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

NG CT:SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead