Karnataka High Court

MFA/3220/2026 of SRI KEERTHIKUMAR Vs SMT NANDA on 5 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:26756-DB MFA No. 3220 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3220 OF 2026 (MC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI KEERTHI KUMAR AGED

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3220 OF 2026 (MC)

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI KEERTHI KUMAR

AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

S/O. LATE SANJEEVA,

R/AT DOOR NO.7-69,

KOTEBAGILU PRANTHYA VILLAGE,

MOODABIDRI POST,

MOODABIDRI TALUK,

D.K.DISTRICT-574227.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. JAYAKARA SHETTY H., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SMT NANDA

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,

W/O.KEERTHI KUMAR,

D/O.LATE SANJEEVA MABIYAAN,

R/AT DOOR NO.1-12, 'SHIVAPRASAD'

KAJALEKKI HOUSE, JARKALA MUNLI POST

JARKALA VILLAGE, MOODABIDRI POST,

KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT.

…RESPONDENT

Digitally

signed by

VASANTHA

KUMARY B K

Location:

HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 28(1) OF HINDU

MARRIAGE ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED

21.01.2026 PASSED IN MC NO.78/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA, ALLOWING THE

PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION13(1) (ia) AND (ib) OF THE

HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)

The present miscellaneous first appeal has been filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, impugning the judgment and decree dated 21.01.2026 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and ACJM, Karkala in M.C.No.78/2025 instituted by the respondent/wife seeking a decree of dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

2. The appellant/Husband remained absent from the proceedings. Therefore, he was placed ex parte and vide impugned judgment and decree dated 21.01.2026, the

HC-KAR

petition filed by the wife under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, has been allowed and the permanent alimony of Rs.3,00,000/- and Rs.10,000/- towards expenses of litigation has been granted.

3. When the appellant did not contest the proceedings before the Family Court, we find no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and decree dated 21.01.2026. Therefore, the instant appeal is dismissed.

4. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any do not survive for consideration, hence stand disposed of.

SD/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE

SD/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

NG CT: SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead