Karnataka High Court
WA/927/2024 of M V GURURAJ Vs A N PADMA on 4 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:26494-DB WA No. 927 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 927 OF 2024 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: M.V.GURURAJ AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O. M.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
WRIT APPEAL NO. 927 OF 2024 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
M.V.GURURAJ
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
S/O. M. V.VENKATASUBBAIAH SHETTY,
R/AT MOODALAGIRI COFFEE WORKS,
BHARATHI BEEDI,
SRINGERI - 577 139,
CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VISHWAJITH T.K.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
A.N.PADMA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
D/O. NAGABHUSHANA,
BHARATHI STREET,
SRINGERI - 577 139,
2.
THE PATTANA PANCHAYAT
SRINGERI - 577 139,
CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF OFFICER.
Digitally
signed by
REKHA R
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
3.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT,
CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 102.
4.
THE TAHASILDAR AND
TALUK MAGISTRATE
KOPPA TALUK,
KOPPA - 577 126,
CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT.
5.
THE KARNATAKA STATE
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
REGIONAL OFFICE,
3RD CROSS, 4TH PHASE,
KALYANAGARA, CDA LAYOUT,
JYOTHINAGAR POST,
CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 102,
REPRESENTED BY ITS ENVIRONMENTAL AND
POLLUTION CONTROL OFFICER.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN WP
NO.54540/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE
OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT, HEAR THE PARTIES AND PASS
A JUDGEMENT TO MODIFY THE ORDER DATED 25/04/2014 IN
WP NO.57540/2014 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE
OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT AND ALLOW THIS WRIT APPEAL
BY DIRECTING THE PRODUCTION UNIT OF THE APPELLANT
HERE
IN
FOR
CLASSIFICATION
ONLY
AFTER
DUE
CLASSIFICATION BY THE KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD AS PER POLLUTION INDEX SCORE AND TO
ALLOW THE PRODUCTION UNIT OF APPELLANT HERE IN TO
CARRY ON ITS ACTIVITIES UNTIL ITS CLASSIFICATION AS PER
POLLUTION INDEX SCORE AND AS PER ZONAL REGULATION
AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS AS
THIS HONOURABLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO PASS UNDER THE
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
None has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant in the first call and not even in the revised call.
It appears appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. We find no other way, but to dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3