Karnataka High Court
WP/16021/2024 of IDBI BANK LTD Vs SRI BASAVARAJ on 3 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:25988-DB WP No. 16021 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO.16021 OF 2024 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: 1. IDBI BANK LTD RETAIL RECOVERY IDBI
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
WRIT PETITION NO.16021 OF 2024 (GM-CON)
BETWEEN:
1.
IDBI BANK LTD
RETAIL RECOVERY
IDBI HOUSE
58, MISSION ROAD
BENGALURU-560 027
REPRESENTED BY ITS
DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI T P MUTHANNA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI BASAVARAJ
S/O JAMBANNA
HOUSE NO.128, WARD NO.1
CHAGANUR VILLAGE
BALLARI TALUK AND DISTRICT
PIN-583 111
2.
THE WAREHOUSE MANAGER
KARNATAKA WAREHOUSE CORPORATION
STATE WAREHOUSE UNIT-1
KIADB, BALLARI-573 101
…RESPONDENTS
(BY MS. ANITHA KRISHNAMURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI JAGADEESHA B N, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
Digitally
signed by
VASANTHA
KUMARY B K
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE COMMON ORDER DATED 24.11.2023 IN APPEAL
NOS.275-283/2018 INSOFAR AS RESPONDENT NO.1 IN APPEAL
NO.282/2018 AND RESPONDENT NO.2 IN APPEAL NOS.275- 283/2018 ARE CONCERNED ON THE FILE OF THE KARNATAKA
STATE
CONSUMER
DISPUTES
REDRESSAL
COMMISSION,
BENGALURU (PRINCIPAL BENCH) AT ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
1. The present writ petition has been filed impugning the order dated 24.11.2023 passed by the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the State Commission') in Appeal Nos.275 to 283/2018.
2. Under Section 58 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the petitioner has an efficacious alternate remedy to challenge the order passed by the State Commission before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the National Commission'). Instead of approaching the National Commission, the petitioner has approached this Court.
HC-KAR
3. In view of the efficacious statutory remedy available to the petitioner under Section 58 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, we dismiss this writ petition as not maintainable.
Interim order granted on 10.07.2024 shall remain in operation for a period of six weeks.
SD/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
SD/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
BKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8