Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/488/2026 of SRI. CHANDRAPPA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 2 June 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:26167 CRL.A No. 488 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 488 OF 2026 (U/S 14( A ) (2)-) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O. LATE PAPANNA,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 488 OF 2026 (U/S 14(A) (2)-)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. CHANDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
S/O. LATE PAPANNA,
PERMANENT RESIDENT OF
RAMASANDRA VILLAGE,
NARASAPURA HOBLI,
KOLAR TALUK - 563 101
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MONESH KUMAR K B.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
VEMAGAL POLICE STATION, KOLAR, 563101
REPRESENTED BY THE SPP.,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU 560 001.
2.
SRI. PRAVEEN R,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
S/O. RAMAPPA,
RESIDING AT RAMASANDRA VILLAGE,
NARASAPURA HOBLI,
KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT 563 101.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1.)
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 09.10.2024
AND TO GRANT HIM REGULAR BAIL IN SPL.S.C.NO.12/2024
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYAN N
Location: High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
FOR THE OFFENCES WHICH ARE MADE PENAL UNDER
SECTIONS 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 307, 302, 504, 506 READ
WITH SECTION 149 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE AND UNDER
SECTIONS 3(1)(R), 3(1)(S), 3(2)(V) OF THE SCHEDULED
CASTES
AND
SCHEDULED
TRIBES
(PREVENTION
OF
ATROCITIES)
ACT,REGISTERED
IN
CR.NO.98/2024
OF
VEMAGAL P.S KOLAR DISTRICT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF
THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLAR.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
The appellant counsel has filed a memo to withdraw the appeal.
2. The memo of withdrawal which reads as under: "MEMO FILES ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT The appellant above named, humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit him to withdraw the above Criminal Appeal as the appellant would renew his request for bail before the trial Court as there is a change in circumstances in the above case. Therefore, the appellant above named, humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to read and record this Memo and further be pleased to dismiss the above Criminal Appeal as withdrawn, in the ends of justice."
HC-KAR
3. Memo is placed on record.
4. In view of the memo, the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE
KBM. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61