Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/7256/2026 of SRI.MANUKUMAR B.T., Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:25245 CRL.P No. 7256 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MAY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND CRIMINAL PETITION No. 7256 OF 2026 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.MANUKUMAR B.T., S/O LATE THIMMAIAH, NOW AGED

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MAY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

CRIMINAL PETITION No. 7256 OF 2026 (482(Cr.PC) /

528(BNSS))

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI.MANUKUMAR B.T.,

S/O LATE THIMMAIAH,

NOW AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,

R/AT T.BEGUR VILLAGE @ POST

KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK,

BENGALORE RURAL DISTRICT PIN-562123

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR S.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REP BY NELAMANGALA RURAL POLICE STATION, AT NELAMANGALA 562 123, REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

BENGALORE 560 001

2.

SMT. RATHNAMMA

W/O LINGAPPA @ LINGAIAH,

NOW AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,

R/AT NO.328, 10TH A MAIN ROAD,

5TH BLOCK BHUVANESWARINAGARA,

RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALORE CITY PIN-560021

3.

SMT.GEETHA LAKSHMI @ GEETHAMMA

W/O LATE RAJANNA,

Digitally

signed by

VINUTHA B S

Location:

High Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

NOW AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

PERMANENT R/AT THARABANAHALLI VILLAGE

DODDAHEJJAJI POST

DODDABALLAPURA TALUK,

BENGALORE RURAL DISTRICT PIN-561204

AND ALSO R/AT NO.13

SHIVANAHALLI,

1ST MAIN

RAJAJINAGARA

BENGALORE PIN-560010

4.

SRI.MANJUNATH T.R @ MANJUNATHA

S/O LATE RAJANNA,

NOW AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,

PERMANENT R/AT THARABANAHALLI VILLAGE

DODDAHEJJAJI POST,

DODDABALLAPURA TALUK,

BENGALORE RURAL DISTRICT PIN-561204

AND ALSO R/AT NO.13

SHIVANAHALLI

1ST MAIN RAJAJINAGARA BENGALORE PIN-560010

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. M.M. WAHEEDA, HCGP FOR R1;

SRI. SUNIL K.N., ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.482(FILED

U/S.528 BNSS) CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE

PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.2204/2016 ARISE OUT OF CRIME

NO.100/2016

REGISTERED

BY

THE

FIRST

RESPONDENT

POLICE/NELAMANGALA

RURAL

POLICE

AGAINST

THE

PETITIONER PENDING BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE

AND JMFC AT NELAMANGALA FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 323, 354, 506 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC ON THE COMPLIANT BY THE

SECOND RESPONDENT IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER IS

CONCERNED, BY ALLOWING THIS MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL

PETITION.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

HC-KAR

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Heard Sri Pawan Kumar S., learned counsel for the petitioner; Smt. M.M. Waheeda, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No.1; and Sri Sunil K.N., learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4.

2. This petition is filed by accused No.2 in C.C. No.2204/2016. Respondent Nos.2 to 4 are the complainant and victims. The petitioner and respondent Nos.2 to 4 have jointly filed an application under Section 320 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1993 seeking permission to compound the offences. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 323, 354 and 504 read with Section 34 of the IPC.

3. The application is accompanied by affidavits sworn to by the petitioner and respondent Nos.2 to 4. Along with the application, a joint memo dated 19.05.2026 has also been filed, duly signed by the petitioner, respondent Nos.2 to 4, and their respective learned counsel.

HC-KAR

4. The parties, who are present before the Court, jointly submit that they have amicably settled the dispute and that they have no objection for quashing the criminal proceedings which are the subject matter of the present petition. They have also jointly submitted, in response to the query made by the Court, that they have understood the contents of the application as well as the joint memo and are fully aware of the consequences thereof.

5. The said submission is placed on record.

6. The parties present before the Court are identified by their respective learned counsel, and they have affixed their signatures on the order sheet.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the statements made by the petitioner and respondent Nos.2 to 4, who are present before the Court, and upon perusal of the joint memo as well as the nature of the alleged offences, this Court finds no impediment

HC-KAR

to accept the joint memo and permit compounding of the offences.

8. The joint memo reads as follows: "1. It is submitted that on the complaint of the respondent No.2, respondent No.1 police have registered a case in Cr.No. 100/2016 on 07/03/2026 for the offences punishable under sections 323, 354, 506 R/w 34 of IPC and thereafter the first respondent Police have filed a charge sheet against the petitioners for the offence punishable U/s 323, 354, 506 R/w 34 of IPC it was numbered as C.C.No.2204/2016 on the file of Hon'ble Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC at Nelamangala.

2. It is submitted that at the intervention of the elders of both sides have reconciled all the differences between the parties and compromised the aforesaid disputes in order to bring the peace between the parties. Accordingly the petitioner and the Respondent No.2,3&4 and others have compromised their dispute in O.S.No.390/2018 on the file of I Addl. Senior Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Nelamangala and they by settling all disputes relating to properties as well as the criminal cases, Pursuant to the said compromise, Original Suit No.390/2018 was disposed of by the Court of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Nelamangala. Hence for the said reason, deserves to be quashed by the hands of this Hon'ble Court.

3. In view of the settlement arrived at, the Respondent No.2, 3 & 4 (Victim No.1, 2 & 3) have no wish to continue the criminal proceedings initiated by them and they have no objection for quashing the proceedings against the petitioner. Since the alleged offences are punishable under section U/s sec 323, 354, 506 R/w 34 of IPC which are non-compoundable, without permission of the court, this application is filed seeking permission to compound the above said offences.

4. The petitioner and the Respondent No.2, 3 & 4 (Victim No.1, 2 & 3) have understood the contents of

HC-KAR

this application and out of their free will, volition and without any fear, force, threat, or coercion, have affixed their signatures to this application."

9. In the light of the joint statement made by the petitioner and respondent Nos.2 to 4, and in view of the admitted joint memo dated 19.05.2026, this Court is inclined to accept the joint memo. Accordingly, the following:

O R D E R

(i) The Criminal petition is allowed.

(ii) The proceedings in C.C. No.2204/2016 arising out of Crime No.100/2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 354 and 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC, pending on the file of the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Nelamangala, are hereby quashed.

SD/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE

VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead