Karnataka High Court
WP/12431/2026 of SMT RITU Vs SRI C ANJANAPPA REDDY on 21 May 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:25241 WP No. 12431 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MAY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 12431 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT RITU W/O SRI. ASHOK KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO. DF1, SVS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MAY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
WRIT PETITION NO. 12431 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT RITU
W/O SRI. ASHOK KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/AT FLAT NO. DF1, SVS ANANDA NILAYAM
YERRANAPALYA ROAD, HERITAGE FARM,
RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BANGALORE- 560 016
ALSO AT SITE NO.84/1, SHOP NO.2,
16TH ROSS, OPP. THALESSERI HOTEL,
NEELADRI MAIN ROAD, ELECTRONIC CITY
BENGALURU - 560 100
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S. SREEVATSA, LEARNED SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. M.D.RAGHUNATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI C ANJANAPPA REDDY
S/O LATE SRI. CHIKKANNA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
R/AT NO.5, CELEBRITY MAIN ROAD,
DODDATHOGUR, ELECTRONIC CITY,
BENGALURU - 560 010
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. VIKRAM A. HUILGOL, LEARNED SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. MOHANA C., ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by
NIRMALA
DEVI
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ALLOW THE WRIT
PETITION WITH COSTS II) ISSUE AN ORDER OF CERTIORARI
QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, IN O.S. 131/2026, DATED
06.02.2026 ON IA 1/2026, AT ANNEXURE C AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent, after arguing the matter for sometime, jointly submits as under:
i. The respondent would not in any manner interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of the suit property, till the interim applications are adjudicated by the Trial Court;
ii. In the event electricity has been disconnected, the respondent would have no objection and will not in
HC-KAR
any manner impede the petitioner from taking such measures for restoration of the electricity;
iii. In the event any asbestos sheets have been removed, the respondent would not obstruct the petitioner from replacing the said asbestos sheet.
2. The said submissions are made without prejudice to the rights and contentions of both parties and the said submissions are not to be construed as either of the parties conceding to any of their contentions.
3. It shall be open to the parties to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement in the matter.
4. In view of the submissions as noticed above, nothing further is required to be adjudicated in the matter and the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 103