Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/2038/2026 of SHIVARAJU K N Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 19 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:24796 CRL.P No. 2038 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MAY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2038 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SHIVARAJU K N S/O NINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, CURRENTLY RESIDING AT NO.32, 1ST

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MAY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2038 OF 2026

BETWEEN:

SHIVARAJU K N

S/O NINGAIAH

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

CURRENTLY RESIDING AT NO.32,

1ST FLOOR, 5TH CROSS,

VIDYAMANANAGAR

BENGALURU - 560 091

NATIVE AT KARLAHATTI VILLAGE,

BISAGURU POST, KUDUR HOBLI,

MAGADI TALUK

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. HARISH PRABHU S., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY PEENYA POLICE STATION

REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

HIGH COURT BUILDING

BENGALURU

Digitally signed

by VINUTHA B

S

Location: High

Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

2.

SMT. AMRUTHA C.J.

D/O LATE JAYARAM

AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,

RESIDING AT GRUHA LAKSHMI LAYOUT,

GANGONDANAHALLI MAIN ROAD,

BENGALURU

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1

SRI. S.G. LOKESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483

BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING

THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO

ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN S.C.NO.1044/2025

(CR.NO.268/2024) REGISTERED BY PEENYA P.S. BENGALURU

FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 376(2)(n),323,504,506,420 OF IPC

PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE PRL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS

JUDGE AT BENGALURU.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

This criminal petition is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, (for short “BNSS”) by the petitioner/accused seeking grant of bail in Crime No.268/2024 dated 28.05.2024 registered by Peenya Police

HC-KAR

Station, Bengaluru City, for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 323, 324, 420, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (for short “IPC”) pending on the file of the LIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in S.C. No.1044/2025.

2. The accused was granted bail by order dated 19.06.2024 passed in Crl.Mis.No.5072/2024. Subsequently, an application came to be filed seeking cancellation of bail on the allegation of violation of the bail conditions. The Trial Court has taken note of certain material in the nature of photographs allegedly posted by the victim on social media depicting injuries, as also photographs showing the accused attending a marriage ceremony along with the charge-sheeted witnesses.

3. On the basis of the aforesaid material, an inference has been drawn that the injuries suffered by the victim were on account of pressure allegedly exerted by the petitioner to compel settlement of the case. It is further observed that the accused attending a marriage ceremony along with the charge- sheeted witnesses was with an intention to win over the witnesses.

HC-KAR

4. This Court finds no justification for the aforesaid observations. There is no specific material or instance placed on record demonstrating violation of any of the bail conditions earlier imposed. The reasoning assigned by the Trial Court is largely hypothetical and based on presumptions and surmises.

5. In light of the above discussion, this Court proceeds to pass the following:

ORDER

i. The criminal petition is allowed;

ii. The petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail in Crime No.268/2024 dated 28.05.2024 registered by Peenya Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 323, 324, 420, 504 and 506 of IPC, subject to the following conditions:

(a) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court; (b) The petitioner shall appear regularly before the Trial Court on all dates of hearing;

HC-KAR

(c) The petitioner shall not, either directly or indirectly, threaten, or tamper with the prosecution witnesses; (d) The petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence in future.

Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE

HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 72

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead