Karnataka High Court

WP/13248/2026 of SMT. VENKATAMMA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 28 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:23828 WP No. 13248 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 13248 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. VENKATAMMA W/O LATE SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,. R/O

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

WRIT PETITION NO. 13248 OF 2026 (KLR-RES)

BETWEEN:

SMT. VENKATAMMA

W/O LATE SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,.

R/O BOLEPURA VILLAGE,

CHANNARAYAPATTANA HOBLI

DEVANAHALLI TALUK,

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT

BENGALURU - 562 129.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. MANOJ B. YADAV, ADVOCATE FOR

SRI. SHANKARALINGE GOWDA K.S, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

VIDHANA SOUDHA

AMBEDKAR VEEDHI

BENGALURU - 560 001.

2.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,

ADDRESSED AT DISTRICT OFFICE COMPLEX,

BEERASANDRA VILLAGE,

DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110

Digitally signed

by JUANITA

THEJESWINI

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

3.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

DODDABALLAPURA SUBDIVISION

ADDRESSED AT DISTRICT OFFICE COMPLEX,

BEERASANDRA VILLAGE

DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.

4.

THE TAHSILDAR

DEVANAHALLI TALUK

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,

DEVANAHALLI - 562 110.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN

THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS BY DIRECTING THE 4TH

RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION VIDE

ANNEXURE - F AND DATED 31.07.2025 AND ETC., THIS

PETITION,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for all the respondents.

HC-KAR

2. It is the contention of the petitioner that several persons including the petitioner was granted lands to an extent of 30 guntas each as found at Annexure-B. The names of one of such grantee is entered in the revenue records as found at page No.21 at Annexure-C. The petitioner has given a representation to the respondent- Tahsildar at Annexure-F dated 31.07.2025 seeking to enter the name of the petitioner's father-in-law in the revenue records while also seeking issuance of saguvali chit. However, the Tahsildar has not considered the representation till date.

3. The prayer in the petition is to issue a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.4-Tahsildar, Devanahalli Taluk, to issue saguvali chit in favour of the petitioner's father-in-law. The counsel further prays that directions be issued to the respondent-Tahsildar to enter the name of the petitioner's father-in-law in the revenue records.

HC-KAR

4. The writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 – Tahasildar, Devanahalli Taluk to consider the representation given by the petitioner at Annexure-F dated 31.07.2025, verify the records and find out whether Sri.Nagappa was indeed granted the land. If it is found that the Committee had in fact regularised the land in favour of Sri.Nagappa the Tahasildar shall proceed to pass necessary orders issuing Saguvali chit and enter his name in the land records pursuant to the issuance of the Saguvali chit. Subsequent to that the Tahsildar shall look into the aspect of the legal heirs of Sri.Nagappa and after verifying the same he shall proceed to enter the names of the legal heirs in accordance with law. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Ordered accordingly.

HC-KAR

5. Learned High Court Government Pleader is granted four weeks time to file his memo of appearance.

Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE

rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead