Karnataka High Court
CRP/696/2025 of SRI.K.M. PRASANNA KUMAR Vs SMT.SHANTHA on 28 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:23594 CRP No. 696 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 696 OF 2025 (IO) BETWEEN: SRI.K.M. PRASANNA KUMAR S/O. LATE K.C. MALLAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 696 OF 2025 (IO)
BETWEEN:
SRI.K.M. PRASANNA KUMAR
S/O. LATE K.C. MALLAPPA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
PREVIOUSLY RESIDING AT NO.521,
17TH D MAIN, 6E CROSS,
6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
BENGALURU-560 095,
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.153,
19TH MAIN, 6TH BLOCK,
KORAMANGALA,
BENGALURU-560 095.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SAMARTH V. AWATI, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. JAYARAJ D.S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT.SHANTHA
W/O. NARAYANA,
D/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
Digitally signed
by YASHODA K L
Location: High
Court Of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
SMT. RAJESHWARI,
D/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
RESPONDENTS ARE
RESIDING AT NO.78/1,
DODDA BELLE COLONY,
OPPOSITE ANNEMMA TEMPLE,
DODDABELE VILLAGE,
KENGERI HOBLI,
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
KARNATAKA - 562 132.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRP IS FILED U/S 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO CALL
FOR RECORDS IN O.S.NO.310/2023 AND SET ASIDE THE
IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 05.06.2024 PASSED BY THE
HON'BLE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
JMFC, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AT BENGALURU IN
REJECTING IA NO.III FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(D) READ
WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC, 1908 VIDE ANNEXURE-A2 AND
ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the suit in O.S.No.310/2023 from out of which the present civil revision petition arises has been disposed of by the trial Court and therefore, the prayer made in this petition has become infructuous.
2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of as the prayer made in the petition become infructuous.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
GPG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9