Karnataka High Court
WP/13479/2026 of SRI K S CHANNARAMAYYA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 28 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:23742 WP No. 13479 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 13479 OF 2026 (LR) BETWEEN: SRI K S CHANNARAMAYYA S/O. SUBBARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS KESTHURU VILLAGE,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 13479 OF 2026 (LR)
BETWEEN:
SRI K S CHANNARAMAYYA
S/O. SUBBARAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
KESTHURU VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI,
DODBALLAPURA TALUK
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-561203.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JEEVAN S.M., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. SHIVA KUMAR N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
M.S. BUILDING,
BENGALURU – 560001
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
DODBALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION,
DODBALLAPURA,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-561203.
3.
THE THASILDAR,
DODBALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION,
DODBALLAPURA TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-561203.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA)
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER
DATED 31.08.2018 PASSED BY THE R-2 IN CASE NO.LRF(DO)
344/2012-13 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND DIRECTIONS TO THE R-1
AND 2 TO EFFECT REVENUE ENTRIES IN FAVOUR OF THE
PETITIONER HEREIN IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING OLD
SY.NO. 256/1 NEW SY.NO. 256/4 MEASURING 0-11.8 GUNTAS
SITUATED AT TIPPUR VILLAGE, DODDABELAMANGALA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK BANALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents.
2. This writ petition was filed by the petitioner being aggrieved of the order dated 31.08.2018 passed by the 2nd respondent – Assistant Commissioner in No.LRF(Do) 344/2012-13 in terms of Sections 79A and B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this is a case where the impugned order of forfeiture has been passed by the Assistant Commissioner without notice
HC-KAR
to the petitioner. It is further submitted that under similar circumstances, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.7821/2021 has passed an order dated 16.08.2021 remanding the matter back to the Assistant Commissioner for fresh consideration after affording an opportunity of hearing to the aggrieved person.
4. Learned Additional Government Advocate points out from the impugned order that notice was indeed issued to the petitioner and in spite of notice having been issued, the petitioner did not appear before the Assistant Commissioner.
5. Admittedly, as on the date of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Second Amendment) Act, 2020, no proceedings were pending before any court/authority.
6. This Court had several occasions to consider such cases, where writ petitions are filed long after the provisions contained in Sections 79A, 79B and 79C were omitted from the statute book in terms of the Karnataka
HC-KAR
Land Reforms (Second Amendment) Act, 2020. It is the consistent opinion of this Court that if at any rate, the Assistant Commissioner, after forfeiting the land has not disposed of the same in accordance with law then the benefit of the saving clause contained in Section 12 of the Amending Act is required to be given to such petitioners. The Assistant Commissioner is therefore, required to ascertain, whether the declared excess lands or forfeited lands still remain with the State Government or has been granted to third parties. If the lands have been granted to third party, then sub-section(1) of Section 12 of the amending Act will apply to say that the proceedings have reached finality. Or otherwise, sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the Amending Act will apply and all further proceedings shall be declared as abated by the Assistant Commissioner.
7. Having considered the submission of the learned Counsels and on perusing the judgment of the co-ordinate Bench in W.P.No.7821/2021, this Court finds that facts
HC-KAR
and circumstances in both these matters are quite similar and therefore, the benefit of the decision of the co- ordinate bench should also enure to the petitioner herein.
8. Accordingly, this Court proceeds to pass the following:
ORDER
i) The writ petition is disposed of. ii) The matter is remanded back to the respondent-Assistant Commissioner to consider the case of the petitioner including the consequences of the subsequent amendment brought to the provisions of Sections 79A and 79B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 in Karnataka (Second Amendment) Act No.56 of 2020. iii) If revenue entries have been altered pursuant to the impugned order dated
HC-KAR
31.08.2018, the same shall be restored in favour of the petitioner. iv) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent-Assistant Commissioner on 29th May, 2026, without waiting for further notice from the Assistant Commissioner. Ordered accordingly.
8. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file his memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
KLY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43