Karnataka High Court
WP/37163/2017 of SMT VENKATALAKSHMAMMA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 28 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:23747 WP No. 37163 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 37163 OF 2017 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA W/O GOPALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS D/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 37163 OF 2017 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA
W/O GOPALAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
D/O VENKATACHALAIAH,
R/AT. ABBIGERE VILLAGE,
YASHWANTHPURA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK,
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-560 020.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KRISHNA R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
M.S. BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT,
K.G. ROAD,
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE NORTH DIVISION,
KANDAYA BHAVAN,
K.G. ROAD,
BANGALORE-560009.
4.
THE TASHILDAR
BANGALORE-NORTH TALUK,
TALUK OFFICE COMPOUND,
Digitally signed
by YASHODA K L
Location: High
Court Of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE-560001.
5.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS-
TECHNICAL ASSISTANT TO DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVANA, K.G.ROAD,
BANGALORE-560009.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA FOR R1 TO R5)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED
BY THE R-2 DATED 25.07.2017 VIDE ANNEXURE-P IN SO FAR AS
PETITIONER IS CONCERNED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner and the learned counsel for the petitioner have filed a memo dated 25.04.2026 stating that the petitioner is not willing to prosecute the matter and therefore the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
HC-KAR
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
KLY List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1