Karnataka High Court
WP/13461/2026 of SRI. CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 28 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:23830 WP No. 13461 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 13461 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SRI. CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA S/O. LATE SRI. CHIKKAULLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 13461 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
SRI. CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA
S/O. LATE SRI. CHIKKAULLAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS,
R/O. BALEPURA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 129.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANOJ B. YADAV, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. SHANKARALINGE GOWDA K.S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
ADDRESSED AT DISTRICT OFFICE COMPLEX,
BEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
DODDABALLAPURA SUBDIVISION,
ADDRESSED AT DISTRICT OFFICE COMPLEX,
Digitally signed
by JUANITA
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
BEERASANDRA VILLAGE,
DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.
4.
THE TAHSILDAR,
DEVANAHALLI TALUK,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
DEVANAHALLI - 562 110.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION VIDE
ANNX-F DATED 31.07.2025 AND ETC.,
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents.
2. It is the contention of the petitioner that several persons including the petitioner was granted lands to an extent of 25 guntas each as found at Annexure-B. The names of one of such grantee is entered in the revenue
HC-KAR
records as found at page No.21 at Annexure-C. The petitioner has given a representation to the respondent- Tahsildar at Annexure-F dated 31.07.2025 seeking to enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue records while also seeking issuance of saguvali chit. However, the Tahsildar has not considered the representation till date.
3. The prayer in the petition is to issue a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.4-Tahsildar, Devanahalli Taluk, to issue saguvali chit in favour of the petitioner. The counsel further prays that directions be issued to the respondent-Tahsildar to enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue records.
4. The writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 – Tahasildar, Devanahalli Taluk to consider the representation given by the petitioner at Annexure-F dated 31.07.2025, verify the records and find out whether the petitioner was indeed granted the land. If it is found that the Committee had in
HC-KAR
fact regularised the land in favour of the petitioner, the Tahasildar shall proceed to pass necessary orders issuing Saguvali chit and enter his name in the land records pursuant to the issuance of the Saguvali chit in accordance with law. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Ordered accordingly.
5. Learned Additional Government Advocate is granted four weeks time to file his memo of appearance.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41