Karnataka High Court
WP/31226/2024 of MR. MADHUKUMAR K M Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 27 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:23411 WP No. 31226 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 31226 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: MR. MADHUKUMAR K M S/O LATE B M MUNIRAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/ A
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO. 31226 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
MR. MADHUKUMAR K M
S/O LATE B M MUNIRAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/A NO.142/1, KYALASANAHALLI VILLAGE,
KOTHANURU POST,
BENGALURU 560077.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.RENUKARADHYA R.D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU - 560001
KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
BENGALURU NORTH, KANDAYA BHAVAN,
KG ROAD, BENGALURU 560009
Digitally signed
by YASHODA K L
Location: High
Court Of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
KARNATAKA
3.
THE SPECIAL TAHSILDHAR
BENGALURU EAST, KR PURAM,
BENGALURU 560036.
4.
MR.K.V MUNIANJINAPPA
S/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA,
R/A KYALASANAHALLI VILLAGE,
KOTHANURU POST,
BENGALURU – 560077.
5.
MR.K M MUNIYAPPA
S/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA,
R/A KYALASANAHALLI VILLAGE,
KOTHANURU POST,
BENGALURU – 560077.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R3 TO
MUTATE THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN THE RTC AS PER
ITS OWN ORDERS DATED 01/01/2024 AND 20/06/2024, UNTIL
THE MATTER IS DECIDED BY R3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW
AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner and learned counsel for petitioner have filed a memo dated 16.04.2026 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
KLY CT: JL