Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/4123/2026 of SRI. MANU R @ MANOHARA @ SEVEN MANU Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA BY on 27 April 2026
NC: 2026:KHC:23491 CRL.P No. 4123 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4123 OF 2026 (439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI. MANU R @ MANOHARA @ SEVEN MANU S/O LATE RAVI, AGE
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4123 OF 2026
(439(Cr.PC) / 483(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
SRI. MANU R @ MANOHARA
@ SEVEN MANU
S/O LATE RAVI,
AGE 28 YEARS,
R/AT NO.120, 2ND MAIN RAOD,
4TH CROSS, BAPUJINAGAR,
BANGALORE 560026
(MANU.R @ MANOHARA@ SEVEN MANU SOWN INT
HE CHARGE SHEET)
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.T., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
Digitally
signed by
PAVITHRA
N
Location:
High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
SHO, BYATARAYANAPURA P.S
BANGALORE – 560 003.
REPT BY
THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT
BANGALORE 560001
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. ANITHA GIRISH N., HCGP)
-----
CRL.P FILED U/S 439 CR.P.C (U/S 483 BNSS) BY THE
ADVOCATE FOR
THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS
HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ENLARGE THE
PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.294/2025 NOW NUMBERED AS
SC.NO.1721/2025,
FOR
THE
OFFENCES
P/U/S
103(1),
238(a), 3(5) OF BNS, 2023, PENDING BEFORE THE HON’BLE
LXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUGE (CCH-66) AT
BANGALORE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. This criminal petition is filed by the petitioner herein who is arrayed as accused No. 2 seeking regular bail in Crime No.294/2025 filed by the respondent-Police for the offences punishable under Section 103(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short BNS). Factual matrix of the case:
2. The case of the prosecution is that one Shankar had lodged a complaint stating that he was living along with his family in the address stated in the complaint and he was working as an autorikshaw driver. It is stated that the deceased Kaushik was none other than the son of the elder brother of the complainant. On 08.09.2025 around 07.15 p.m., the complainant had received a message from his mother stating that Kaushik was killed by unknown persons. The complainant immediately went to the spot and learnt about the death of the deceased. It is further submitted that the complainant has learnt that Kaushik
HC-KAR
had been killed by Manohar and Chandan around 01.00 a.m. Therefore, he lodges a complaint against the petitioners. The respondent – Police, after registering the case, conducted the investigation and submitted the charge-sheet.
3. Heard Sri. Harish Kumar M.T., learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Anitha Girish N., learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent of the alleged offences and he has been falsely implicated in this case. The entire case is based on circumstantial evidence. CW-2 is stated to be the eyewitness, however, he has not chosen to lodge the complaint.
5. The petitioner has aged mother and he has to take care of his mother and his family. He will abide by the conditions to be imposed by this Court in the event of his release on bail. The petitioner is a permanent resident of
HC-KAR
Bapujinagara, Bangalore. Hence, he may be enlarged on bail by allowing the petition. Making such submissions learned counsel for the petitioner prays to allow the petition.
6. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent – State of Karnataka vehemently submitted that the averments of the complaint indicates that the petitioner and another had intentionally picked up a quarrel with the deceased and assaulted him indiscriminately. It is stated that, the accused No.1 has dropped a size stone on the head of the deceased. The petitioner has assaulted the deceased with beer bottle. The overt-act against the petitioner is similar as that of another accused. Therefore, it is not appropriate to grant him bail. Making such submissions learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent prays to reject the petition.
HC-KAR
7. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the averments of the charge-sheet. It appears that the petitioner and another are the friends of deceased-Kaushik. On 05.09.2025 around 11.30 p.m. the deceased Kaushik had quarreled with the younger brother of accused No.1/CW-23 and threatened them with dire consequences. The petitioner had also been harassed by the deceased-Kaushik. Therefore, both accused Nos. 1 and 2 hatched conspiracy to commit the murder of the deceased. Hence, on 07.09.2025 at about 10.30 p.m., accused Nos. 1 and 2 learnt that deceased - Kaushik was consuming liquor at Madhura Bar & Restaurant situated at Mysore Road. They went there and picked up quarrel in the said Bar & Restaurant. The cashier of the said Madhura Bar & Restaurant sent them out from the bar. Thereafter, all of them went out of the said bar, taking advantage of the said situation accused Nos.1 and 2 assaulted the deceased and committed his murder.
HC-KAR
8. Be that as it may, the entire case is based on circumstantial evidence. The overt-act against the present petitioner is that he had assaulted the deceased with beer bottle. However, accused No.1 allegedly, dropped a size stone on the head of the deceased. Having considered the nature and gravity of the offence, it is appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner herein by imposing suitable conditions that would take care of the apprehension of the prosecution.
9. Hence, I proceed to pass the following :
ORDER
i. This Criminal Petition is allowed. ii. The petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail in Crime No.294/2025 filed by the respondent-Police for the offences punishable under Section 103(1), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, on executing a personal bond for a sum of
HC-KAR
Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) with one (01) surety to the like sum of the satisfaction of the Trial Court. iii. The petitioner shall not threaten or tamper with the prosecution witnesses nor hamper the proceedings of the Court. iv. The petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court on all hearing dates, without fail. v. The petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal cases till disposal of the case. In case the petitioner violates any of the bail conditions stated supra, liberty is reserved to the prosecution to file necessary application for cancellation of bail.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NM