Karnataka High Court

WP/12634/2026 of SRI A SREENIVASIAH Vs THE TAHSILDAR on 27 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

NC: 2026:KHC:23328 WP No. 12634 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 12634 OF 2026 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. A . SREENIVASIAH S/O. LATE PILLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/O. NO.

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

WRIT PETITION NO. 12634 OF 2026 (KLR-REG)

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI. A. SREENIVASIAH

S/O. LATE PILLA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,

R/O. NO. L-80, 15TH CROSS,

5TH MAIN, SECTOR 6, HSR LAYOUT,

BENGALURU - 560 102.

2.

SRI. RAVEESH REDDY S

S/O. A SREENIVASIAH,

AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

R/O. NO. L-80, 15TH CROSS,

5TH MAIN, SECTOR 6, HSR LAYOUT,

BENGALURU - 560 102.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. P. MAHESHA., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE TAHSILDAR

HOSKOTE TALUK,

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114.

2.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,

BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT,

DISTRICT OFFICE COMPLEX,

BEERASANDRA VILLAGE,

Digitally signed

by JUANITA

THEJESWINI

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

DEVANAHALLI TALUK,

BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO 1. ISSUE WRIT OF

MANDAMUS, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 THE

TAHSILDAR, HOSKOTE TALUK TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION

FILED BY THE FATHER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 13.01.1981

AND REGULARISE THE UNAUTHORISED OCCUPATION AND

CULTIVATION OF THE KHARAB LANDS AS REQUESTED BY THE

PETITIONERS IN ANNEXURE - D AND ETC.,

THIS

PETITION,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for both the respondents.

2. It is the contention of the petitioners that father of petitioner No.1 late Sri.Pillareddy, filed an application in Form No.50 on 13.01.1981 seeking regularisation of unauthorised occupation of 1 acre and 26 guntas of land in Survey No.210/1 and 2 acres & 12 guntas, 1 acre and 35 guntas of land, which is

HC-KAR

said to be in between Survey Nos.210/1, 211/1 and 211/2 of Muthsandra Village, Anegondanahalli Hobli, Hoskote Taluk, Bangalore Rural District but the application is still not considered. Therefore, the prayer in the petition is to direct the respondents to consider the said application.

3. Having regard to the contentions raised in the writ petition and submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court is of the considered opinion that respondent No.1-Tahsildar was duty bound to place the application filed by petitioner No.1 before the ‘Committee for Regularization of Unauthorized Occupation’ and the Committee was also duty bound to consider the application and pass necessary orders.

4. The writ petition stands disposed of with a specific direction to respondent No.1-Tahsildar, Hoskote Taluk, to verify from the records as to whether such application filed by the petitioner No.1 in the year 1981 is pending consideration. If it is found that such an application was indeed filed by the petitioner No.1 and the application is yet to be considered, the Tahsildar is directed to place before the Committee for

HC-KAR

regularisation of unauthorised occupation, the application along with his recommendation within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall consider the said application and pass necessary orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months.

Ordered accordingly.

Learned High Court Government Pleader is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.

Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE

rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead